Crossref
journal-article
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE (340)
References
42
Referenced
587
10.1016/j.sbi.2009.03.004
/ Curr Opin Struct Biol / Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. by JL Klepeis (2009){'key': 'ref2', 'article-title': 'Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations on Anton. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC09)', 'author': 'DE Shaw', 'year': '2009'}
/ Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations on Anton. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC09) by DE Shaw (2009)10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.06.010
/ J Mol Graph Model / GPU-accelerated molecular modeling coming of age. by JE Stone (2010)10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.062
/ Curr Biol / Protein dynamics: Moore's law in molecular biology. by M Vendruscolo (2011)10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R13985
/ Phys Rev B / Parallel replica method for dynamics of infrequent events. by AF Voter (1998)10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.014
/ J Comput Phys / Zonal methods for the parallel execution of range-limited N-body simulations. by KJ Bowers (2007)10.1016/j.sbi.2007.03.003
/ Curr Opin Struct Biol / Improved sampling methods for molecular simulation. by H Lei (2007)10.1126/science.1187409
/ Science / Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. by DE Shaw (2010)10.1063/1.3565032
/ J Chem Phys / Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. by JH Prinz (2011)10.1529/biophysj.108.132696
/ Biophys J / Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical? by RB Best (2008)10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.062
/ Biophys J / Scrutinizing molecular mechanics force fields on the submicrosecond timescale with NMR data. by OF Lange (2010)10.1002/prot.21123
/ Proteins / Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. by V Hornak (2006)10.1021/jp901540t
/ J Phys Chem B / Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. by RB Best (2009)10.1002/prot.22711
/ Proteins / Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. by K Lindorff-Larsen (2010)10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.051
/ Biophys J / How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization? by S Piana (2011)10.1002/jcc.10349
/ J Comput Chem / A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. by Y Duan (2003)10.1021/jp003919d
/ J Phys Chem B / Evaluation and parametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. by GA Kaminski (2001)10.1021/jp973084f
/ J Phys Chem B / All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. by AD MacKerell Jr (1998)10.1002/jcc.20065
/ J Comput Chem / Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. by AD MacKerell Jr (2004)10.1021/ja0687668
/ J Am Chem Soc / Exploring multiple timescale motions in protein GB3 using accelerated molecular dynamics and NMR spectroscopy. by PR Markwick (2007)10.1021/ja200461n
/ J Am Chem Soc / Weak long-range correlated motions in a surface patch of ubiquitin involved in molecular recognition. by RB Fenwick (2011)10.1126/science.1157092
/ Science / Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. by OF Lange (2008)10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.033
/ Biophys J / Force field bias in protein folding simulations. by PL Freddolino (2009)10.1021/ja00097a039
/ J Am Chem Soc / Distribution of helicity within the model peptide acetyl(AAQAA)3amide. by W Shalongo (1994)10.1021/ja8030533
/ J Am Chem Soc / Crystal structure of a ten-amino acid protein. by S Honda (2008)10.1038/nphys1713
/ Nat Phys / Challenges in protein folding simulations: timescale, representation, and analysis. by PL Freddolin (2010)10.1371/journal.pone.0018868
/ PLoS One / The energy computation paradox and ab initio protein folding. by JC Faver (2011)10.1021/jp102575b
/ J Phys Chem B / Balance between alpha and beta structures in ab initio protein folding. by RB Best (2010)10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.034
/ J Mol Biol / Sub-microsecond protein folding. by J Kubelka (2006)10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.023
/ J Mol Biol / Computational design and experimental testing of the fastest-folding β-sheet protein. by S Piana (2011)10.1126/science.1208351
/ Science / How fast-folding proteins fold. by K Lindorff-Larsen (2011)10.1063/1.445869
/ J Chem Phys / Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. by WL Jorgensen (1983)10.1063/1.1839571
/ J Chem Phys / Gaussian split Ewald: a fast Ewald mesh method for molecular simulation. by Y Shan (2005)10.1021/ja9812610
/ J Am Chem Soc / Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. by G Conilescu (1998)10.1021/ja0350684
/ J Am Chem Soc / Evaluation of backbone proton positions and dynamics in a small protein by liquid crystal NMR spectroscopy. by TS Ulmer (2003)10.1021/ja070324o
/ J Am Chem Soc / Limits on variations in protein backbone dynamics from precise measurements of scalar couplings. by B Vögeli (2007)10.1007/s10858-005-8873-0
/ J Biomol NMR / Interpreting dynamically-averaged scalar couplings in proteins. by K Lindorff-Larsen (2005)10.1021/ja9535524
/ J Am Chem Soc / Determination of the backbone dihedral angles φ in human ubiquitin from reparametrized empirical Karplus equations. by AC Wang (1996)10.1038/nature03199
/ Nature / Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. by K Lindorff-Larsen (2005)10.1209/0295-5075/19/6/002
/ Europhys Lett / Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme. by E Marinari (1992)10.1063/1.440484
/ J Chem Phys / The stable states picture of chemical reactions. I. Formulation for rate constants and initial conditional effects. by SH Northrup (1980)10.1063/1.2206581
/ J Chem Phys / Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics. by CJ Fennell (2006)
Dates
Type | When |
---|---|
Created | 13 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 22, 2012, 5:13 p.m.) |
Deposited | 3 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 30, 2021, 8:57 a.m.) |
Indexed | 3 days, 12 hours ago (Aug. 31, 2025, 6:23 a.m.) |
Issued | 13 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 22, 2012) |
Published | 13 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 22, 2012) |
Published Online | 13 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 22, 2012) |
@article{Lindorff_Larsen_2012, title={Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data}, volume={7}, ISSN={1932-6203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032131}, DOI={10.1371/journal.pone.0032131}, number={2}, journal={PLoS ONE}, publisher={Public Library of Science (PLoS)}, author={Lindorff-Larsen, Kresten and Maragakis, Paul and Piana, Stefano and Eastwood, Michael P. and Dror, Ron O. and Shaw, David E.}, editor={Muller, Daniel J.}, year={2012}, month=feb, pages={e32131} }