Crossref journal-article
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Science (221)
Abstract

The Landers earthquake in June 1992 redistributed stress in southern California, shutting off the production of small earthquakes in some regions while increasing the seismicity in neighboring regions, up to the present. This earthquake also changed the ratio of small to large events in favor of more small earthquakes within about 100 kilometers of the epicenter. This implies that the probabilistic estimate for future earthquakes in southern California changed because of the Landers earthquake. The location of the strongest increase in probability for large earthquakes in southern California was the volume that subsequently produced the largest slip in the magnitude 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake of October 1999.

Bibliography

Wyss, M., & Wiemer, S. (2000). Change in the Probability for Earthquakes in Southern California Due to the Landers Magnitude 7.3 Earthquake. Science, 290(5495), 1334–1338.

Authors 2
  1. Max Wyss (first)
  2. Stefan Wiemer (additional)
References 62 Referenced 107
  1. Wald D. J., Heaton T. H., Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 668 (1994). (10.1785/BSSA0840030668) / Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. by Wald D. J. (1994)
  2. 10.1126/science.260.5114.1617
  3. Bodin P., Gomberg J., Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 835 (1994). / Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. by Bodin P. (1994)
  4. 10.1126/science.258.5086.1328
  5. The Coulomb failure stress change Δσ f = Δτ − μ(Δσ n – Δ∏) where Δτ is the shear stress change resolved into the fault plane Δσ n is the stress change perpendicular to the fault plane (positive toward the plane) μ is the coefficient of friction and Δ∏ is the pore pressure measures the change of stress on preexisting faults that is due to a redistribution of stress by a major tectonic event. Increasing τ or reducing σ n advances the probability of failure. This probability is also increased if a reduction of τ is accompanied by an even larger reduction in σ n . The free parameters of the model are (i) orientation of the local fault plane (ii) details of the geometry of the main rupture (iii) orientation of the regional stress field (in the case of choosing planes with optimal orientation) (iv) μ and (v) ∏. We suggest that these parameters are poorly known with margins of error that allow adjustments such that the observed seismicity rate changes are correctly modeled. We view the quantitatively established pattern of increased and decreased seismicity as a solid observation that may help constrain the model along with other data such as the measurements of surface deformations near the mainshock.
  6. Wiemer S., Wyss M., Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 900 (1994). / Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. by Wiemer S. (1994)
  7. Scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey Southern California Earthquake Center and California Division of Mines and Geology Seismol. Res. Lett. 71 11 (2000). (10.1785/gssrl.71.1.11)
  8. The analysis reported was performed on the declustered [
  9. Reasenberg P. A., J. Geophys. Res. 90, 5479 (1985); (10.1029/JB090iB07p05479) / J. Geophys. Res. by Reasenberg P. A. (1985)
  10. ] data set because the estimate of the background values of a ′ and b should not be contaminated by aftershocks and swarms. However we also performed all analyses using the full data set including aftershocks. We found that the results do not depend on the inclusion or exclusion of clusters.
  11. The homogeneity of reporting earthquakes over decades and as a function of space is a thorny question that we have investigated in detail before conducting seismicity studies [
  12. Zuniga F. R., Wyss M., Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 1858 (1995); (10.1785/BSSA0850061858) / Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. by Zuniga F. R. (1995)
  13. Zuniga F. R., Wiemer S., Pure Appl. Geophys. 153, 713 (1999); (10.1007/s000240050285) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Zuniga F. R. (1999)
  14. ]. In general most reported rate changes are due to artificial causes and we have developed criteria by which some of these can be identified. We examined the earthquake catalog for southern California (Southern California Earthquake Center) by the GENAS algorithm [
  15. Habermann R. E., J. Geophys. Res. 88, 5056 (1983); (10.1029/JB088iB06p05056) / J. Geophys. Res. by Habermann R. E. (1983)
  16. ] and found that it is of high quality since 1981 but does contain some changes that may be artificial. The changes we report here do not conform to patterns of known artificial changes; they coincide with the time of the Landers earthquake and they have opposite signs (increase and decrease in neighboring volumes). Therefore these changes are likely of natural origin. In addition we deleted small volumes that contained a strong preponderance of daytime events from the analysis because these are most likely explosions.
  17. S. Wiemer thesis University of Alaska Fairbanks (1996).
  18. Instead of reporting percentages of rate changes which could be large but statistically insignificant we estimate the statistical significance of the rate change at a given time t c by the standard deviate Z test Z = (μ 2 − μ 1 )/( S 1 / n 1 + S 2 / n 2 ) 1/2 . The larger the difference between the two means μ and the larger the numbers of samples n before and after t c (index 1 and 2 respectively) the more confidence one can place in the significance of a difference whereas large variances of the means S decrease the confidence.
  19. T. Utsu in Report of the Joint Research Institute for Statistical Mathematics (Institute for Statistical Mathematics Tokyo 1992) vol. 34 pp. 139–157.
  20. Marriott D., Hreinsdottir S., Wyss M., Eos 81, S302 (2000). / Eos by Marriott D. (2000)
  21. Parsons T., Dreger D. S., Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1949 (2000). (10.1029/1999GL011272) / Geophys. Res. Lett. by Parsons T. (2000)
  22. Recently we have shown that the b value is not as constant ( b ≈ 1) as previously thought [
  23. Frohlich C., Davis S., J. Geophys. Res. 98, 631 (1993); (10.1029/92JB01891) / J. Geophys. Res. by Frohlich C. (1993)
  24. Kagan Y. Y., Pure Appl. Geophys. 155, 537 (1999); (10.1007/s000240050277) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Kagan Y. Y. (1999)
  25. ] and can vary between 0.5 and 1.5 along fault zones [
  26. Wiemer S., Wyss M., J. Geophys. Res. 102, 15115 (1997); (10.1029/97JB00726) / J. Geophys. Res. by Wiemer S. (1997)
  27. Ogata Y., Katsura K., Geophys. J. Int. 113, 727 (1993); (10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb04663.x) / Geophys. J. Int. by Ogata Y. (1993)
  28. Amelung F., King G., Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 507 (1997); (10.1029/97GL00287) / Geophys. Res. Lett. by Amelung F. (1997)
  29. ]. We tested the hypothesis that asperities the crucial hard spots that control main ruptures may be mapped by minima in b values and in T L values [
  30. Wyss M., Schorlemmer D., Wiemer S., J. Geophys. Res. 105, 7829 (2000); (10.1029/1999JB900347) / J. Geophys. Res. by Wyss M. (2000)
  31. ]. Thus asperities seem to be locations that produce more medium-sized earthquakes relative to small ones than does the normal crust.
  32. Aki K., Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. 43, 237 (1965). / Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. by Aki K. (1965)
  33. Increasingly detailed earthquake catalogs reveal that beneath volcanoes volumes surrounding the magma chambers produce far more small earthquakes ( b = 1.5) than does the rest of the crust [(41);
  34. Wiemer S., McNutt S., Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 189 (1997); (10.1029/96GL03779) / Geophys. Res. Lett. by Wiemer S. (1997)
  35. Murru M., Montuori C., Wyss M., Privitera E., Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 2553 (1999); (10.1029/1999GL900568) / Geophys. Res. Lett. by Murru M. (1999)
  36. ] and that temporal changes of b values occur during intrusions [(41);
  37. Wyss M., Shimazaki K., Wiemer S., J. Geophys. Res. 102, 20413 (1997)]. (10.1029/97JB01074) / J. Geophys. Res. by Wyss M. (1997)
  38. The seismic hazard is usually expressed in expected ground acceleration which is calculated on the basis of P using attenuation laws and source zone definitions as well as long historic earthquake catalogs. In addition some national efforts of mapping the seismic hazard include information on crustal deformation. On occasion attempts are made to estimate the time-dependent hazard by also considering the occurrence time of the last large earthquakes on prominent faults. Here we focus exclusively on the element of hazard assessment brought in by the turning on and off of seismicity due to stress redistribution by major ruptures.
  39. Gross S. J., Kisslinger C., J. Geophys. Res. 102, 7603 (1997). (10.1029/96JB03741) / J. Geophys. Res. by Gross S. J. (1997)
  40. Bowman D. D., Ouillon G., Sammis C. G., Sornette A., Sornette D., J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24359 (1998). (10.1029/98JB00792) / J. Geophys. Res. by Bowman D. D. (1998)
  41. Kato N., Ohtake M., Hirasawa T., Pure Appl. Geophys. 150, 249 (1997). (10.1007/s000240050075) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Kato N. (1997)
  42. Wyss M., Martyrosian A. H., Geophys. J. Int. 134, 329 (1998). (10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00543.x) / Geophys. J. Int. by Wyss M. (1998)
  43. Wyss M., Hasegawa A., Wiemer S., Umino N., Ann. Geophys. 42, 851 (1999). (10.4401/ag-3765) / Ann. Geophys. by Wyss M. (1999)
  44. Wyss M., Wiemer S., Pure Appl. Geophys. 153, 259 (1999). (10.1007/s000240050265) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Wyss M. (1999)
  45. Jones L. M., Hauksson E., Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 469 (1997). (10.1029/97GL00188) / Geophys. Res. Lett. by Jones L. M. (1997)
  46. Varnes D. J., Pure Appl. Geophys. 130, 661 (1989). (10.1007/BF00881603) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Varnes D. J. (1989)
  47. Jaume S., Sykes L. R., Pure Appl. Geophys. 155, 279 (1999). (10.1007/s000240050266) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Jaume S. (1999)
  48. Sammis C. G., Smith S. W., Pure Appl. Geophys. 155, 307 (1999). (10.1007/s000240050267) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Sammis C. G. (1999)
  49. 10.1785/BSSA0580010399
  50. Wyss M., Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 31, 341 (1973). (10.1111/j.1365-246X.1973.tb06506.x) / Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. by Wyss M. (1973)
  51. Urbancic T. I., Trifu C. I., Long J. M., Young R. P., Pure Appl. Geophys. 139, 449 (1992). (10.1007/BF00879946) / Pure Appl. Geophys. by Urbancic T. I. (1992)
  52. Boatwright J., Cocco M., J. Geophys. Res. 101, 13895 (1996). (10.1029/96JB00405) / J. Geophys. Res. by Boatwright J. (1996)
  53. D. Kilb J. Gomberg P. Bodin Nature in press.
  54. Richardson E., Marone C., J. Geophys. Res. 104, 28859 (1999). (10.1029/1999JB900320) / J. Geophys. Res. by Richardson E. (1999)
  55. 10.1029/1999JB900056
  56. 10.1038/45144
  57. Reasenberg P. A., Simpson R. W., U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1550-D, D49 (1997). / U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. by Reasenberg P. A. (1997)
  58. Keilis-Borok V. I., Knopoff L., Rotwain I., Allen C. R., Nature 335, 690 (1988). (10.1038/335690a0) / Nature by Keilis-Borok V. I. (1988)
  59. Knopoff L., Levshina T., Keilis-Borok V. I., Mattoni C., J. Geophys. Res. 101, 5779 (1996). (10.1029/95JB03730) / J. Geophys. Res. by Knopoff L. (1996)
  60. Press F., Allen C., J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6421 (1995). (10.1029/95JB00316) / J. Geophys. Res. by Press F. (1995)
  61. Wiemer S., McNutt S. R., Wyss M., Geophys. J. Int. 134, 409 (1998). (10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00561.x) / Geophys. J. Int. by Wiemer S. (1998)
  62. We thank M. Gerstenberger C. Sammis and three anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by NSF grant EAR 9902717. This paper is contribution number 1151 of the Geophysical Institute Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich.
Dates
Type When
Created 23 years, 1 month ago (July 27, 2002, 5:47 a.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 7 months ago (Jan. 13, 2024, 3:55 a.m.)
Indexed 2 months, 3 weeks ago (June 9, 2025, 8:06 p.m.)
Issued 24 years, 9 months ago (Nov. 17, 2000)
Published 24 years, 9 months ago (Nov. 17, 2000)
Published Print 24 years, 9 months ago (Nov. 17, 2000)
Funders 0

None

@article{Wyss_2000, title={Change in the Probability for Earthquakes in Southern California Due to the Landers Magnitude 7.3 Earthquake}, volume={290}, ISSN={1095-9203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5495.1334}, DOI={10.1126/science.290.5495.1334}, number={5495}, journal={Science}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Wyss, Max and Wiemer, Stefan}, year={2000}, month=nov, pages={1334–1338} }