Crossref journal-article
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Science (221)
Abstract

The quantum-confined Stark effect in single cadmium selenide (CdSe) nanocrystallite quantum dots was studied. The electric field dependence of the single-dot spectrum is characterized by a highly polarizable excited state (∼10 5 cubic angstroms, compared to typical molecular values of order 10 to 100 cubic angstroms), in the presence of randomly oriented local electric fields that change over time. These local fields result in spontaneous spectral diffusion and contribute to ensemble inhomogeneous broadening. Stark shifts of the lowest excited state more than two orders of magnitude larger than the linewidth were observed, suggesting the potential use of these dots in electro-optic modulation devices.

Bibliography

Empedocles, S. A., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997). Quantum-Confined Stark Effect in Single CdSe Nanocrystallite Quantum Dots. Science, 278(5346), 2114–2117.

Authors 2
  1. S. A. Empedocles (first)
  2. M. G. Bawendi (additional)
References 30 Referenced 879
  1. D. A. Miller Confined Excitons and Photons (Plenum New York 1995) p. 675. (10.1007/978-1-4615-1963-8_22)
  2. L. Brus Appl. Phys. A 53 456 (1991); (10.1007/BF00331535)
  3. 10.1126/science.271.5251.933
  4. Empedocles S. A., Norris D. J., Bawendi M. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3873 (1996). (10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3873) / Phys. Rev. Lett. by Empedocles S. A. (1996)
  5. 10.1126/science.267.5206.1966
  6. Gammon D., et al., ibid. 277, 85 (1997). / ibid. by Gammon D. (1997)
  7. 10.1021/ja00072a025
  8. 10.1016/0022-0248(94)91132-0
  9. Kagan C. R., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1517 (1996). (10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1517) / Phys. Rev. Lett. by Kagan C. R. (1996)
  10. 10.1126/science.270.5240.1335
  11. Colvin V. L., Alivisatos A. P., J. Chem. Phys. 97, 730 (1992); (10.1063/1.463573) / J. Chem. Phys. by Colvin V. L. (1992)
  12. Colvin V. L., Cunningham K. L., Alivisatos A. P., ibid. 101, 7122 (1994). / ibid. by Colvin V. L. (1994)
  13. Hache F., Richard D., Flytzanis C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1504 (1989); (10.1063/1.102257) / Appl. Phys. Lett. by Hache F. (1989)
  14. Sacra A., Norris D. J., Murray C. B., Bawendi M. G., J. Chem. Phys. 103, 5236 (1995). (10.1063/1.470559) / J. Chem. Phys. by Sacra A. (1995)
  15. Blanton S. A., Hines M. A., Guyot-Sionnest P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3905 (1996). (10.1063/1.117565) / Appl. Phys. Lett. by Blanton S. A. (1996)
  16. J. Tittel et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 101 3013 (1997). (10.1021/jp963801q)
  17. Nirmal M., et al., Nature 383, 802 (1996). (10.1038/383802a0) / Nature by Nirmal M. (1996)
  18. 10.1021/jp9530562
  19. ; B. O. Dabbousi et al. J. Phys. Chem B. 101 9463 (1997). (10.1021/jp971091y)
  20. Numerical calculations show a relatively uniform field across the substrate surface at a distance farther than 1 μm from either electrode (the field profile varies with σ = 7% of the mean).
  21. D. Norris Al. Efros
  22. Rosen M., Bawendi M., Phys. Rev. B 53, 16347 (1996). (10.1103/PhysRevB.53.16347) / Phys. Rev. B by Rosen M. (1996)
  23. Formally what is measured in these experiments is actually the difference between the excited- and ground-state dipole (polarizability). For simplicity in discussion we refer to this value as the excited-state dipole (polarizability). This is a reasonable assertion because to a first approximation any structural (ground-state) dipole (polarizability) should be relatively unaffected by the presence of a delocalized excitation.
  24. A. Sacra thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1996).
  25. Schmidt M. E., Blanton S. A., Hines M. A., Guyot-Sionnest P., J. Chem. Phys. 106, 5254 (1997). (10.1063/1.473524) / J. Chem. Phys. by Schmidt M. E. (1997)
  26. Al.
  27. Efros L., et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, 1 (1996). (10.1103/PhysRevB.54.4843) / Phys. Rev. B by Efros L. (1996)
  28. A similar broadening in QWs results from a lifetime effect due to field ionization of the exciton. If the observed broadening in CdSe QDs was lifetime-limited implying an excited-state lifetime of ∼10 −14 s the very slow radiative relaxation (∼10 −6 s) would be completely quenched (quantum yield ∼10 −8 ). The observed high fluorescence intensity suggests that field ionization is not a significant contribution.
  29. Data were collected from 47 single QDs for the 37.5 Å overcoated sample and from 57 83 74 and 16 single QDs for the 37.5 Å 29 Å 26 Å and 22 Å standard samples respectively. Calculations included screening by the CdSe core and ZnS shell as necessary.
  30. S.A.E. benefited from a Department of Defense graduate fellowship. This work was supported by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Sloan Foundation. This research was funded in part by the NSF–Materials Research Science and Engineering Center program (DMR-94-00034). We thank the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Harrison Spectroscopy Laboratory (NSF-CHE-93-04251) for support and for allowing use of its facilities.
Dates
Type When
Created 23 years, 1 month ago (July 27, 2002, 5:37 a.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 7 months ago (Jan. 12, 2024, 11:55 p.m.)
Indexed 4 days, 13 hours ago (Aug. 27, 2025, 11:56 a.m.)
Issued 27 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 19, 1997)
Published 27 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 19, 1997)
Published Print 27 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 19, 1997)
Funders 0

None

@article{Empedocles_1997, title={Quantum-Confined Stark Effect in Single CdSe Nanocrystallite Quantum Dots}, volume={278}, ISSN={1095-9203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5346.2114}, DOI={10.1126/science.278.5346.2114}, number={5346}, journal={Science}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Empedocles, S. A. and Bawendi, M. G.}, year={1997}, month=dec, pages={2114–2117} }