Crossref journal-article
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Science (221)
Abstract

Posttetanic potentiation (PTP) is a common form of short-term synaptic plasticity that is generally thought to be entirely presynaptic. Consistent with that idea, PTP of evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials at Aplysia sensory-motor neuron synapses in cell culture was reduced by presynaptic injection of a slow calcium chelator and was accompanied by an increase in the frequency but not the amplitude of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic potentials. However, PTP was also reduced by postsynaptic injection of a rapid calcium chelator or postsynaptic hyperpolarization. Thus, PTP at these synapses is likely to involve a postsynaptic induction mechanism in addition to the known presynaptic mechanisms.

Bibliography

Bao, J.-X., Kandel, E. R., & Hawkins, R. D. (1997). Involvement of Pre- and Postsynaptic Mechanisms in Posttetanic Potentiation at Aplysia Synapses. Science, 275(5302), 969–973.

Authors 3
  1. Jian-Xin Bao (first)
  2. Eric R. Kandel (additional)
  3. Robert D. Hawkins (additional)
References 44 Referenced 93
  1. Feng T. P. Chin. J. Physiol. 16 341 (1941); (10.5840/thought1941162114)
  2. Waziri R. , Kandel E. R. , Frazier W. T., J. Neurophysiol. 32,509 (1969); / J. Neurophysiol. by Waziri R. (1969)
  3. Epstein R. and , Tauc L., J. Physiol. (London) 209, 1 (1970); / London / J. Physiol. by Epstein R. (1970)
  4. Magleby K. L. and , Zengel J. E., ibid. 245, 183 (1975); / ibid. by Magleby K. L. (1975)
  5. Atwood H. L. and , Wojtowicz J. M., Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 28, 275 (1986); (10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60111-7) / Int. Rev. Neurobiol. by Atwood H. L. (1986)
  6. 10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.000305
  7. Neth. J. Zool. 44, 495 (1994). / Neth. J. Zool. (1994)
  8. Clark G. A. Kandel E. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81 2577 (1984); (10.1073/pnas.81.8.2577)
  9. Walters E. T. and , Byrne J. H., Brain Res. 293, 377 (1984); (10.1016/0006-8993(84)91247-2) / Brain Res. by Walters E. T. (1984)
  10. Schacher S. , Montarolo P. G. , Kandel E. R., J. Neurosci. 10, 3286 (1990). (10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-10-03286.1990) / J. Neurosci. by Schacher S. (1990)
  11. Eliot L. S., Kandel E. R., Hawkins R. D., J. Neurosci. 14, 3280 (1994). (10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-03280.1994) / J. Neurosci. by Eliot L. S. (1994)
  12. Dale N., Kandel E. R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 7163 (1993). (10.1073/pnas.90.15.7163) / Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. by Dale N. (1993)
  13. Lin X. Y., Glanzman D. L., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 255, 113 (1994). (10.1098/rspb.1994.0016) / Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. by Lin X. Y. (1994)
  14. Lin X. Y., Glanzman D. L., ibid.215. / ibid. by Lin X. Y.
  15. A single identified L7 gill motor neuron or LFS siphon motor neuron was isolated from the abdominal ganglion of a juvenile (1 to 4 g) or adult (70 to 100 g) Aplysia respectively (Howard Hughes Medical Institute Mariculture Facility Miami FL) and co-cultured with a mechanosensory neuron isolated from the pleural ganglion of an adult animal. Several criteria were used to identify LFS cells [W. N. Frost thesis Columbia University New York (1987) p. 113; L. S. Eliot R. D. Hawkins E. R. Kandel S. Schacher J. Neurosci. 14 368 (1994)] although it is possible that some of the putative LFS cells were not motor neurons. The axon stump of the dissociated sensory neuron was placed near the initial segment of the main axon of the motor neuron where functional synapses are formed. The cells were plated in culture dishes coated with poly-L-lysine (0.5 mg/ml) and left overnight at room temperature after which the dishes were moved to an incubator where they were maintained at 18°C for 3 to 6 days. The culture medium consisted of 50% filtered Aplysia hemolymph and 50% L-15 medium (Flow Laboratories McLean VA) supplemented with salts (NaC1 260 mM; CaC1 2 10.1 mM; KC1 4.6 mM; MgSO 4 25 mM; MgC1 2 28 mM; and NaHCO 3 2.3 mM) and D-glucose (34.6 mM). Additionally glutamine (1 mM) penicillin (50 U/ml) and streptomycin (50 μg/ml) were also included in the culture medium. The hemolymph was collected from large animals (usually ∼1000 g) and stored at −70°C [S. Schacher and E. Proshansky J. Neurosci. 3 2403 (1983); S. Schacher ibid. 5 2028 (1985).
  16. A motor neuron was impaled with a microelectrode (6 to 15 megohm) filled with 2.5 M KCl for recording of EPSPs. The electrical signals were amplified by a Dagan 8100 (Dagan Minneapolis MN) or Axoclamp 2B (Axon Instruments Foster City CA) amplifier and recorded on a four-channel tape recorder. A conventional bridge balance circuit was used to inject current through the recording electrode. Because it is not possible to produce PTP while the sensory neuron is impaled with an intracellular electrode (3) an extracellular electrode positioned adjacent to the soma was used to stimulate the sensory neuron with a brief (0.1 ms) depolarizing pulse. The stimulation intensity was gradually increased to reach the threshold for firing an action potential in the sensory neuron and evoking an EPSP in the motor neuron. In order to measure the amplitude of EPSPs accurately and to avoid spike initiation in the motor neuron we hyperpolarized the neuron 50 mV (for LFS cells) or 30 mV (for L7 cells) below the resting membrane potential throughout the experiment. The EPSP was tested immediately after impalement of the motor neuron and the culture was discarded if it was smaller than 5 mV. After 30-min rest (or in some experiments 30 min after the start of presynaptic injection of EGTA postsynaptic injection of BAPTA or bath perfusion of L-octanol) EPSPs were evoked at ∼5-min intervals for 40 min. For PTP experiments a tetanus (20 Hz for 2 s) was applied 10 min after the first EPSP in the series with a stimulus intensity 20 to 30% above that used to evoke the previous EPSP which was sufficient to produce one-for-one EPSPs during the tetanus. All experiments were performed at room temperature (20° to 23°C). The culture dish was continuously perfused at a rate of ∼0.5 ml/min with 50% supplemented L-15 medium and 50% artificial seawater (NaCl 460 mM; KCl 11 mM; CaCl 2 10 mM; MgCl 2 27 mM; and MgSO 4 27 mM). All chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis MO) except for BAPTA which was from Molecular Probes (Eugene OR).
  17. Kretz R. Shapiro E. Kandel E. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79 5430 (1982); (10.1073/pnas.79.17.5430)
  18. Connor J. A. , Kretz R. , Shapiro E., J. Physiol. (London) 375, 625 (1986). / London / J. Physiol. by Connor J. A. (1986)
  19. Delaney K. R. Zucker R. S. Tank D. W. J. Neurosci. 9 3558 (1989); (10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-10-03558.1989)
  20. Swandulla D. , Hans M. , Zipser K. , Augustine G. J., Neuron 7, 915 (1991). (10.1016/0896-6273(91)90337-Y) / Neuron by Swandulla D. (1991)
  21. Kamiya H., Zucker R. S., Nature 371, 603 (1994). (10.1038/371603a0) / Nature by Kamiya H. (1994)
  22. For EGTA injection into the sensory neurons the tip of the injecting electrode was bevelled to have a resistance of 3 to 6 megohms. The electrodes were connected to a Pico-Injector (Medical Systems Greenvale NY) and pulses of pressure (800 ms duration; 0.3 to 1.4 psi) were delivered at 2-s intervals for 10 to 60 s. EGTA was first dissolved in KOH and the pH was adjusted to 7.5 with HCl. Fast green (0.2%) was usually included in the EGTA solution or the control vehicle solution to visually ensure successful injection. The injection electrode was then withdrawn from the cell and stimulation was begun with an extracellular electrode after a 30-min rest.
  23. Adler E. M., Augustine G. J., Duffy S. N., Charlton M. P., J. Neurosci. 11, 1496 (1991). (10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-06-01496.1991) / J. Neurosci. by Adler E. M. (1991)
  24. The data in the text and figures are expressed as means ± SEM ( n represents the number of cultures) and normalized to the first test EPSP (30 min after the impalement) except where otherwise indicated. Data were analyzed statistically either by t test (paired or unpaired) or by two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with one repeated measure (time). If there was a significant overall effect in the ANOVA comparisons were made at each time point by one-way ANOVAs followed by Fisher PLSD tests. In the experiments shown in Fig. 1B there were significant differences between control PTP and PTP after EGTA injection (PTP/EGTA) [ F (2 19) = 4.291 for treatment P = 0.029; F (16 152) = 5.894 for treatment × time P = 0.0001]. There were no significant differences between the initial EPSPs or EPSPs 30 min after injection in the three groups shown in Fig. 1C.
  25. BAPTA was injected by diffusion or iontophoresis (0.5 to l nA 500 ms at 1 Hz). Similar results were obtained after 20 to 30 min of iontophoretic injection or diffusion. BAPTA injected by these methods into the sensory neuron blocked synaptic transmission suggesting that it was effective in buffering the Ca 2+ concentration. In the experiments shown in Fig. 2 A and B there were significant differences between homosynaptic depression (control) PTP and PTP/BAPTA [for LFS synapses: F (2 18) = 6.281 for treatment P = 0.0085; F (16 144) = 2.428 for treatment × time P = 0.0029; for L7 synapses: F (2 18) = 6.214 for treatment P = 0.0089; F (16 144) = 7.191 for treatment × time P = 0.0001]. For LFS synapses the average amplitudes of the EPSPs on trial one 30 min after impalement were 26.4 ± 4.4 mV (control) 23.3 ± 3.7 mV (PTP) and 20.9 ± 3.3 mV (PTP/BAPTA); for L7 synapses they were 17.3 ± 3.1 mV 12.6 ± 3.2 mV and 16.9 ± 3.9 mV respectively. There were no significant differences among EPSP amplitudes on trial one for the three groups at either synapse.
  26. We manually applied 10 μl of 5-HT (50 μM) with a 50-μl Hamilton syringe to the vicinity of the cells as previously described (2). Fast green (0.2%) which by itself did not affect synaptic transmission was included in the 5-HT solution to check the delivery and location of the puff. The solution was washed out in less than 60 s by continuous perfusion of the culture. A two-way ANOVA revealed that 5-HT produced significant facilitation of EPSPs [overall F (2 13) = 8.852 for treatment P = 0.0037 and F (16 104) = 5.718 for treatment × time P = 0.0001] but there was no significant difference between the 5-HT and 5-HT/BAPTA groups. The average amplitudes of EPSPs 30 min after impalement were 25.3 ± 5.1 mV (control) and 19.3 ± 4.6 mV (BAPTA) in the experiments shown in Fig. 3B and 22.7 ± 6.4 mV (control) 28.8 ± 3.6 mV (5-HT) and 20.1 ± 4.2 mV (5-HT/BAPTA) in the experiments shown in Fig. 3C. There were no significant differences among EPSP amplitudes on trial one for the different groups.
  27. Castellucci V. F., Kandel E. R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 5004 (1974). (10.1073/pnas.71.12.5004) / Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. by Castellucci V. F. (1974)
  28. Dale N., Kandel E. R., J. Physiol. London 421, 203 (1990). (10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017941) / J. Physiol. London by Dale N. (1990)
  29. LFS motor neurons were injected with 2 nA of current and L7 motor neurons with 4 nA which produced approximately 50 to 100 mV of additional hyperpolarization below the level at which the motor neurons were held throughout the rest of the experiment (8) as measured in the soma. However the hyperpolarization could have been substantially less at the synaptic region. Overall there were significant differences between control PTP and PTP with hyperpolarization during the tetanus (PTP/HPP) [for LFS synapses: F (2 14) = 6.771 for treatment P = 0.0088; F (16 112) = 4.807 for treatment × time P = 0.0001; for L7 synapses: F (2 19) = 5.22 for treatment P = 0.0156; F (16 152) = 2.951 for treatment × time P = 0.0003]. For LFS synapses EPSPs 30 min after impalement had amplitudes of 18.3 ± 2.5 mV (control) 21.3 ± 5.1 mV (PTP) and 22.1 ± 3.8 mV (PTP/HPP); for L7 synapses they were 14.6 ± 2.6 mV 19.5 ± 4.0 mV and 18.1 ± 3.2 mV respectively. There were no significant differences among EPSP amplitudes on trial one for these three groups.
  30. Electrical coupling between the sensory neuron and motor neuron was monitored by impaling both cells with microelectrodes and applying a hyperpolarizing pulse (30 to 120 mV) to one cell (cell 1) and measuring the change of membrane potential in the other (cell 2). The degree of coupling was defined by: (membrane potential change in cell 2/hyperpolarizing potential applied in cell 1) × 100%. The coupling measured from soma to soma was 1.02 ± 0.49% ( n = 5) from sensory to LFS cell 0.79 ± 0.38% ( n = 5) from LFS to sensory cell 0.32 ± 0.17% ( n = 8) from sensory to L7 cell and 0.23 ± 0.12% ( n = 8) from L7 to sensory cell.
  31. Bennett M. V. L. et al. Neuron 6 305 (1991); (10.1016/0896-6273(91)90241-Q)
  32. Yuste R. , Nelson D. A. , Rubin W. W. , Katz L. C., ibid. 14, 7 (1995). / ibid. by Yuste R. (1995)
  33. Overall there were significant differences between control PTP in the presence of octanol (PTP/octanol) and PTP with hyperpolarization during the tetanus in the presence of octanol [(PTP/HPP)/octanol] [ F (2 15) = 10.068 for treatment P = 0.0176 and F (16 132) = 4.594 for treatment × time P = 0.0001]. EPSPs 30 min after impalement had amplitudes of 14.9 ± 2.3 mV (control) 11.6 ± 1.5 mV (PTP/octanol) and 12.0 ± 4.1 mV [(PTP/HPP)/octanol]. There were no significant differences among EPSP amplitudes on trial one for these three groups.
  34. Recording of spontaneous mEPSPs was made at high gain filtered at 300 Hz (−3 dB) and AC coupled. In experiments in which both evoked and spontaneous mEPSPs were measured eEPSPs were recorded at low gain and DC coupled. Signals were digitized off-line with a PC-based “fetchex” program (part of the “pclamp” package Axon Instruments) and analyzed with an “axobasic” program. We visually identified mEPSPs on the basis of the following criteria: (i) a rise time of 3 to 20 ms (ii) a half-decay time of at least 5 ms and (iii) a minimum amplitude of 50 μV which was usually about 25% greater than the peak-to-peak noise level (3 18). The frequency and the peak amplitude of mEPSPs were then automatically determined by the computer. When the dependent variable was the amplitude of eEPSPs (Fig. 4A) There were significant differences between the PTP and PTP/HPP groups [ F (1 10) = 5.244 for treatment P = 0.045 and F (8 80) = 6.189 for treatment × time P = 0.001). EPSPs 30 min after impalement had amplitudes of 17.8 ± 2.9 mV (PTP) and 25.9 ± 2.3 mV (PTP/HPP) (not significantly different). When the dependent variable was the frequency of mEPSPs (Fig. 4B) there were no significant differences between PTP and PTP/HPP groups. The average frequency of mEPSPs 30 min after impalement was 0.032 ± 0.006 Hz and 0.041 ± 0.007 Hz for PTP and PTP/HPP groups respectively (not significantly different).
  35. Martin A. R. Pilar G. J. Physiol. (London) 175 17 (1964); (10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007500)
  36. Clamann H. P. , Mathis J. , Luscher H. R., J. Neurophysiol. 61, 403 (1989); (10.1152/jn.1989.61.2.403) / J. Neurophysiol. by Clamann H. P. (1989)
  37. Griffith W. H., ibid. 63, 491 (1990). / ibid. by Griffith W. H. (1990)
  38. Anwyl R. Mulkeen D. Rowan M. J. Brain Res. 503 148 (1989); (10.1016/0006-8993(89)91716-2)
  39. Malenka R. C., Neuron 6, 53 (1991). (10.1016/0896-6273(91)90121-F) / Neuron by Malenka R. C. (1991)
  40. O'Dell T. J. Hawkins R. D. Kandel E. R. Arancio O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88 11285 (1991); (10.1073/pnas.88.24.11285)
  41. 10.1126/science.8100368
  42. Murphey R. K. Davis G. W. J. Neurobiol. 25 595 (1994); (10.1002/neu.480250602)
  43. Lo Y.-J. , Lin Y.-C. , Sanes D. H. , Poo M.-M., J. Neurosci. 14, 4694 (1994). (10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04694.1994) / J. Neurosci. by Lo Y.-J. (1994)
  44. Supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH 26212) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. A long-term fellowship from the Human Frontier Science Program Organization to J.-X.B. is gratefully acknowledged.
Dates
Type When
Created 23 years, 1 month ago (July 27, 2002, 5:45 a.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 7 months ago (Jan. 12, 2024, 11:05 p.m.)
Indexed 3 months, 1 week ago (May 27, 2025, 1:45 a.m.)
Issued 28 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 14, 1997)
Published 28 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 14, 1997)
Published Print 28 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 14, 1997)
Funders 0

None

@article{Bao_1997, title={Involvement of Pre- and Postsynaptic Mechanisms in Posttetanic Potentiation at Aplysia Synapses}, volume={275}, ISSN={1095-9203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5302.969}, DOI={10.1126/science.275.5302.969}, number={5302}, journal={Science}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Bao, Jian-Xin and Kandel, Eric R. and Hawkins, Robert D.}, year={1997}, month=feb, pages={969–973} }