Crossref journal-article
Wiley
Journal of Microscopy (311)
Abstract

SummaryBacteria are generally difficult specimens to prepare for conventional resin section electron microscopy and mycobacteria, with their thick and complex cell envelope layers being especially prone to artefacts. Here we made a systematic comparison of different methods for preparing Mycobacterium smegmatis for thin section electron microscopy analysis. These methods were: (1) conventional preparation by fixatives and epoxy resins at ambient temperature. (2) Tokuyasu cryo‐section of chemically fixed bacteria. (3) rapid freezing followed by freeze substitution and embedding in epoxy resin at room temperature or (4) combined with Lowicryl HM20 embedding and ultraviolet (UV) polymerization at low temperature and (5) CEMOVIS, or cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The best preservation of bacteria was obtained with the cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections method, as expected, especially with respect to the preservation of the cell envelope and lipid bodies. By comparison with cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections both the conventional and Tokuyasu methods produced different, undesirable artefacts. The two different types of freeze‐substitution protocols showed variable preservation of the cell envelope but gave acceptable preservation of the cytoplasm, but not lipid bodies, and bacterial DNA. In conclusion although cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections must be considered the ‘gold standard’ among sectioning methods for electron microscopy, because it avoids solvents and stains, the use of optimally prepared freeze substitution also offers some advantages for ultrastructural analysis of bacteria.

Bibliography

BLECK, C. K. E., MERZ, A., GUTIERREZ, M. G., WALTHER, P., DUBOCHET, J., ZUBER, B., & GRIFFITHS, G. (2009). Comparison of different methods for thin section EM analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Journal of Microscopy, 237(1), 23–38. Portico.

Authors 7
  1. C.K.E. BLECK (first)
  2. A. MERZ (additional)
  3. M.G. GUTIERREZ (additional)
  4. P. WALTHER (additional)
  5. J. DUBOCHET (additional)
  6. B. ZUBER (additional)
  7. G. GRIFFITHS (additional)
References 51 Referenced 67
  1. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600366
  2. 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.01.003
  3. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00675.x
  4. 10.1016/S0968-4328(00)00029-9
  5. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1985.tb02660.x
  6. 10.1128/JB.115.1.367-386.1973
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01597.x
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1981.tb02483.x
  9. 10.1128/jb.155.1.381-390.1983
  10. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04241.x
  11. 10.1017/S0033583500004297
  12. 10.1007/BF00527066
  13. 10.1128/JB.187.23.8047-8054.2005
  14. 10.1099/00221287-148-10-3089
  15. 10.1099/mic.0.27869-0
  16. 10.1083/jcb.7.1.27
  17. 10.1128/jb.173.5.1623-1633.1991
  18. 10.1007/978-3-642-77095-1
  19. 10.1016/S0022-5320(84)80024-6
  20. 10.1128/JB.162.3.960-971.1985
  21. 10.1073/pnas.0709530105
  22. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03083.x
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1992.tb03260.x
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb03163.x
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1985.tb02638.x
  26. 10.1128/jb.110.3.1154-1162.1972 / J. Bacteriol. / Osmolar concentration and fixation of mycoplasmas by Lemcke R.M. (1972)
  27. 10.1007/BF02473201
  28. 10.1016/S1047-8477(03)00016-9
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04535.x
  30. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1983.tb04225.x
  31. 10.1083/jcb.48.1.219
  32. 10.1128/jb.174.20.6508-6517.1992
  33. 10.1128/IAI.62.5.1542-1550.1994
  34. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1984.tb00459.x
  35. 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208
  36. 10.1042/BC20070106
  37. 10.1128/MMBR.58.2.211-232.1994
  38. 10.1177/29.5.6166664
  39. 10.1242/jcs.100.1.227 / J. Cell. Sci. / Study of vitrified, unstained frozen tissue sections by cryoimmunoelectron microscopy by Sabanay I. (1991)
  40. 10.1083/jcb.17.1.19
  41. {'key': 'e_1_2_6_42_1', 'first-page': '57', 'article-title': 'Influence of fixatives and embedding media on immunolabelling of freeze‐substituted cells', 'volume': '3', 'author': 'Schwarz H.', 'year': '1989', 'journal-title': 'Scanning Microsc. Suppl.'} / Scanning Microsc. Suppl. / Influence of fixatives and embedding media on immunolabelling of freeze‐substituted cells by Schwarz H. (1989)
  42. 10.1128/jb.113.2.953-962.1973 / J. Bacteriol. / Ultrastructure of the cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane of gram‐negative bacteria with different fixation techniques by Silva M.T. (1973)
  43. 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90493-4
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00361.x
  45. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00919.x
  46. 10.1007/BF01011956
  47. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00552.x
  48. 10.1128/JB.187.11.3607-3619.2005
  49. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01064.x
  50. 10.1128/JB.00391-06
  51. 10.1128/JB.01919-07
Dates
Type When
Created 15 years, 11 months ago (Sept. 16, 2009, 1:10 p.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 9 months ago (Nov. 2, 2023, 7:16 a.m.)
Indexed 2 days, 12 hours ago (Aug. 21, 2025, 2:10 p.m.)
Issued 15 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 10, 2009)
Published 15 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 10, 2009)
Published Online 15 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 10, 2009)
Published Print 15 years, 7 months ago (Jan. 1, 2010)
Funders 0

None

@article{BLECK_2009, title={Comparison of different methods for thin section EM analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis}, volume={237}, ISSN={1365-2818}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03299.x}, DOI={10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03299.x}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Microscopy}, publisher={Wiley}, author={BLECK, C.K.E. and MERZ, A. and GUTIERREZ, M.G. and WALTHER, P. and DUBOCHET, J. and ZUBER, B. and GRIFFITHS, G.}, year={2009}, month=dec, pages={23–38} }