Crossref journal-article
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Genes & Development (246)
Abstract

Transcriptional regulation is all about getting RNA polymerase to the right place on the gene at the right time and making sure that it is competent to conduct transcription. Traditional views of this process place most of their emphasis on the events that precede initiation of transcription. We imagine a promoter-bound transcriptional activator (or collection of activators) recruiting components of the basal transcriptional machinery to the DNA, eventually leading to the recruitment of RNA polymerase II and the onset of gene transcription. Although these events play a crucial role in regulating gene expression, they are only half the story. Correct regulation of transcription requires that polymerase not only initiates when and where it should, but that it stops initiating when no longer appropriate. But how are the signals from transcriptional activators, telling RNA polymerase to fire, terminated? Is this process governed by chance, with activators simply falling off the promoter at a certain frequency? Or is there some more direct mechanism, whereby activators are aggressively limited from uncontrolled promoter activation? A new article by Chi et al. (2001) suggests the latter may be true, and provides a mechanism for how a component of the basal transcription machinery can mark the activators it has encountered, sentencing them to an early death or banishing them from the nucleus. The ability of the basal transcriptional apparatus to mark activators provides an efficient way to limit activator function and ensures that continuing transcription initiation at a promoter is coupled to the continuing synthesis and activation of transcriptional activators.

Bibliography

Tansey, W. P. (2001). Transcriptional activation: risky business. Genes & Development, 15(9), 1045–1050.

Authors 1
  1. William P. Tansey (first)
References 39 Referenced 86
  1. 10.1074/jbc.273.21.12696
  2. 10.1101/gad.867501
  3. {'key': '2021111507350876000_15.9.1045.3', 'first-page': '1997', 'article-title': 'Accumulation of p53 in a mutant cell line defective in the ubiquitin pathway.', 'volume': '14', 'author': 'Chowdary', 'year': '1994', 'journal-title': 'Mol. Cell. Biol.'} / Mol. Cell. Biol. / Accumulation of p53 in a mutant cell line defective in the ubiquitin pathway. by Chowdary (1994)
  4. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81055-7
  5. 10.1128/MCB.18.3.1711 / Mol. Cell. Biol. / The Gcn4p activation domain interacts specifically in vitro with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, TFIID, and the Adap-Gcn5p coactivator complex. by Drysdale (1998)
  6. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80404-3
  7. 10.1038/334721a0
  8. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8058
  9. 10.1101/gad.10.23.2960
  10. 10.1101/gad.11.22.3046
  11. 10.1101/gad.9.8.897
  12. 10.1073/pnas.81.20.6442
  13. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80360-3
  14. 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.405
  15. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-X
  16. 10.1126/science.273.5282.1717
  17. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06948.x / EMBO J. / Regulated degradation of the transcription factor Gcn4. by Kornitzer (1994)
  18. 10.1128/MCB.19.4.2967 / Mol. Cell. Biol. / An activator binding module of yeast RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. by Lee (1999)
  19. 10.1038/374193a0
  20. 10.1038/358641a0
  21. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00576.x / EMBO J. / The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). by Martinez-Pastor (1996)
  22. 10.1091/mbc.11.3.915
  23. 10.1093/emboj/18.22.6439
  24. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90384-3
  25. 10.1038/335683a0
  26. {'key': '2021111507350876000_15.9.1045.26', 'first-page': '5099', 'article-title': 'Translation of the yeast transcriptional activator GCN4 is stimulated by purine limitation: Implications for activation of the protein kinase GCN2.', 'volume': '13', 'author': 'Rolfes', 'year': '1993', 'journal-title': 'Mol. Cell. Biol.'} / Mol. Cell. Biol. / Translation of the yeast transcriptional activator GCN4 is stimulated by purine limitation: Implications for activation of the protein kinase GCN2. by Rolfes (1993)
  27. 10.1093/emboj/18.3.717
  28. 10.1073/pnas.050007597
  29. 10.1074/jbc.274.13.9092
  30. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80403-1
  31. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90511-3
  32. 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8871
  33. 10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90502-9
  34. 10.1128/MCB.15.10.5682 / Mol. Cell. Biol. / Degradation of c-Fos by the 26S proteasome is accelerated by c-Jun and multiple protein kinases. by Tsurumi (1995)
  35. 10.1038/28886
  36. 10.1093/emboj/18.15.4280
  37. 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01122-5
  38. 10.1093/emboj/19.3.392
  39. 10.1101/gad.14.3.301 / Genes & Dev. / c-Kit triggers dual phosphorylations, which couple activation and degradation of the essential melanocyte factor microphthalmia. by Wu (2000)
Dates
Type When
Created 23 years ago (July 26, 2002, 8 p.m.)
Deposited 3 years, 9 months ago (Nov. 15, 2021, 10:37 a.m.)
Indexed 2 weeks, 2 days ago (Aug. 5, 2025, 8:44 a.m.)
Issued 24 years, 3 months ago (May 1, 2001)
Published 24 years, 3 months ago (May 1, 2001)
Published Online 24 years, 3 months ago (May 1, 2001)
Published Print 24 years, 3 months ago (May 1, 2001)
Funders 0

None

@article{Tansey_2001, title={Transcriptional activation: risky business}, volume={15}, ISSN={1549-5477}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.896501}, DOI={10.1101/gad.896501}, number={9}, journal={Genes & Development}, publisher={Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory}, author={Tansey, William P.}, year={2001}, month=may, pages={1045–1050} }