Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity
10.1065/lca2007.04.316
Crossref journal-article
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (297)
Bibliography

Michelsen, O. (2007). Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(1), 22–31.

Authors 1
  1. Ottar Michelsen (first)
References 66 Referenced 26
  1. Aarts BGW, Nienhuis PH (1999): Ecological sustainability and biodiversity. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 6, 89–102 (10.1080/13504509909469998) / International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology by B.G.W. Aarts (1999)
  2. Angelstam P (1998): Towards a logic for assessing biodiversity in boreal forest. In: Bachmann P, Köhl M, Päivinen R (eds), Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Proceedings of the Conference on Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning, 7–11 October 1996, held in Monte Verità, Switzerland. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht / Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Proceedings of the Conference on Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning, 7–11 October 1996 by P. Angelstam (1998)
  3. Angelstam P (2001): Measurement and assessment of biodiversity components in boreal forest. In: Merra A, Finér L, Kaila S, Karjalainen T, Mali J, Pajula T, Korhonen M (eds), Life cycle assessment on forestry and forest products. EUR 19858. European Commission, Directorate-Genaral for Research
  4. Begon M, Harper LJ, Townsend CR (1986): Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell, Cambridge / Individuals, populations and communities by M. Begon (1986)
  5. Bengtsson J, Nilsson SG, Franc A, Menozzi P (2000): Biodiversity, disturbances, acosystem function and managament of European forest. Forest Ecology and Management 132, 39–50 (10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00378-9) / Forest Ecology and Management by J. Bengtsson (2000)
  6. Bennett LT, Adams MA (2004): Assessment of ecological effects due to forest harvesting: Approaches and statistical issues. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 585–598 (10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00924.x) / Journal of Applied Ecology by L.T. Bennett (2004)
  7. Bongers T (1990): The maturity index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83, 14–19 (10.1007/BF00324627) / Oecologia by T. Bongers (1990)
  8. Chapin FS III, Sala OE, Burke IC, Grime JP, Hooper DU, Lauenroth WK, Lombard A, Mooney HA, Mosier AR, Naeem S, Pacala SW, Roy J, Steffen WL, Tilman D (1998): Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity — Experimental evidence and a research agenda for the future. BioScience 48, 45–52 (10.2307/1313227) / BioScience by F.S. Chapin III (1998)
  9. Chapin FS III, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RT, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S (2000): Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242 (10.1038/35012241) / Nature by F.S. Chapin III (2000)
  10. Clay K (2003): Parasites lost. Nature 421, 585–586 (10.1038/421585a) / Nature by K. Clay (2003)
  11. Connell JH (1978): Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310 (10.1126/science.199.4335.1302) / Science by J.H. Connell (1978)
  12. Cushman JH, Dirzo R, Janetos AC, Lubchenco L, Mooney HA, Sala OE (1995): Conclusions. In: Heywood VH (ed), Global Biodiversity Assessment. UNEP/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 446–452 / Global Biodiversity Assessment by J.H. Cushman (1995)
  13. Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Alard D, Saguez R, Wattez-Franger A, de Foucault B, Delelis-Dusollier A, Bardat J (2004): Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: Understorey response to two silvicultural systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 1065–1079 (10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00960.x) / Journal of Applied Ecology by G. Decocq (2004)
  14. Diaz S, Cabido M (2001): Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 646–655 (10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2) / Trends in Ecology & Evolution by S. Diaz (2001)
  15. Didham RK, Ghazoul J, Stork NE, Davis AD (1996): Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 255–260 (10.1016/0169-5347(96)20047-3) / Trends in Ecology & Evolution by R.K. Didham (1996)
  16. Dobson AP, Rodriguez JP, Roberts WM, Wilcove DS (1997): Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275, 550–553 (10.1126/science.275.5299.550) / Science by A.P. Dobson (1997)
  17. Duffy DC, Meier AJ (1992): Do Appalachian herbaceous understories ever recover from clearcutting? Conservation Biology 6, 196–2001 (10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.620196.x) / Conservation Biology by D.C. Duffy (1992)
  18. Eppinga MB, Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, de Ruiter PC (2006): Accumulation of local pathogens: A new hypothesis to explain exotic plant invasions. Oikos 114, 168–176 (10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14625.x) / Oikos by M.B. Eppinga (2006)
  19. Framstad E, Økland B, Bendiksen E, Bakkestuen V, Blom H, Brandrud TE (2002): Assessment of forest production in Norway. NINA fagrapport 54. Norwegian Institute of Nature Research, Trondheim (in Norwegian with English summary) / Assessment of forest production in Norway / NINA fagrapport by E. Framstad (2002)
  20. Fremstad E (1997): Vegetasjonstyper i Norge (Vegetation types in Norway). NINA Temahefte 12. Norwegian Institute of Nature Research, Trondheim (in Norwegian) / Vegetasjonstyper i Norge / NINA Temahefte by E. Fremstad (1997)
  21. Fremstad E, Moen A (2001): Threatened vegetation types in Norway. Rapport botanisk serie 2001-4. Norwegian University of Science and Technology/Muesum of Natural History and Archaeology, Trondheim (in Norwegian with English summary) / Threatened vegetation types in Norway / Rapport botanisk serie by E. Fremstad (2001)
  22. Gaston KJ (1996): Species richness: Measure and measurement. In: Gaston KJ (ed), Biodiversity: A biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 77–113 / Biodiversity: A biology of numbers and difference by K.J. Gaston (1996)
  23. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001): The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology report. Third edition. PRé Consultans, Amersfoort 〈www.pre.nl〉 / The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology report by M. Goedkoop (2001)
  24. Hanski I, Walsh M (2004): How much, how to? Practical tools for forest conservation. Bird Life European Forest Task Force, Helsinki / Practical tools for forest conservation by I. Hanski (2004)
  25. Hansson L (2000): Indicators of biodiversity: recent approaches and some general suggestions. Technical Report No. 1 (updated version 14 April 2000), Bear project 〈 http://www.algonet.se/:_bear/ 〉
  26. Hengeveld R, Edwards PJ, Duffield SJ (1995): Biodiversity from an ecological perspective. In: Heywood VH (ed), Global Biodiversity Assessment. UNEP/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 88–106 / Global Biodiversity Assessment by R. Hengeveld (1995)
  27. Hilmo O, Holien H (2002): Epiphytic lichen response to the edge environment in a boreal Picea abies forest in central Norway. The Bryologist 105, 48–56 (10.1639/0007-2745(2002)105[0048:ELRTTE]2.0.CO;2) / The Bryologist by O. Hilmo (2002)
  28. Hobbelstad K, Gobakken T, Swärd J (2004): Evaluering av Levende Skog. Tilstand og utvikling i norsk skog vurdert i forhold til enkelte standarder. NIJOS rapport 19/04
  29. Hytteborn H, Maslov AA, Nazimova DI, Rysin LP (2005): Boreal forests of Eurasia. In: Andersson F (ed), Coniferous forests of the world. Ecosystems of the world 6. Elsevier, pp 23–99
  30. ISO 14040 (2006): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. Second edition. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva / Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework by ISO 14040 (2006)
  31. ISO 14044 (2006): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva / Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines by ISO 14044 (2006)
  32. Köllner T (2000): Species-pool effect potentials (SPEP) as a yardstick to evaluate land-use impacts on biodiversity. Journal of Cleaner Production 8, 293–311 (10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00026-3) / Journal of Cleaner Production by T. Köllner (2000)
  33. Kyläkorpi L, Rydgren B, Ellegård A, Miliander S, Grusell E (2005): The botope method 2005. A method to assess the impact of land use on biodiversity. Vattenfall, Stockholm / The botope method 2005. A method to assess the impact of land use on biodiversity by L. Kyläkorpi (2005)
  34. Kålås JA, Viken Å, Bakken T (2006): 2006 Norwegian Red List. Artsdatabanken, Trondheim / 2006 Norwegian Red List by J.A. Kålås (2006)
  35. Larsson TB (ed) (2001): Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests. Ecological Bulletins 50, Blackwell Science, Oxford / Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests / Ecological Bulletins (2001)
  36. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD (1998): Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Science 391, 72–76 / Science by J.H. Lawton (1998)
  37. Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Steen B (eds) (2002): Impact assessment of resources and land use. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (eds), Life cycle impact assessment: Striving towards best practice. Setac Press, Pensacola, Florida, pp 11–64
  38. Lippke B, Comnick J, Johnson LR (2005): Environmental performance index for the forest. Wood and Fiber Science 37 (Corrim Special Issue) 149–155 / Wood and Fiber Science by B. Lippke (2005)
  39. Living Forests (1998): The Living Forests standards for sustainable forest management in Norway. 〈 http://www.levendeskog.no/pdf/green.pdf 〉
  40. MacArthur RH, Wilson OE (1967): The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton / The theory of island biogeography by R.H. MacArthur (1967)
  41. Michelsen O, Solli C, Strømman AH (in preparation): Environmental impact and added value in forestry operations in Norway
  42. Milà i Canals L, Clift R, Basson L, Hansen Y, Brandão M (2006): Expert Workshop on Land Use Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). 12–13 June 2006, Guildford, Surrey (UK). Int J LCA 11, 363–368 (10.1065/lca2006.08.262) / Int J LCA by L. Milà i Canals (2006)
  43. Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Müller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007): Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J LCA 12, 5–15 (10.1065/lca2006.05.250) / Int J LCA by L. Milà i Canals (2007)
  44. Molau U, Alatalo JM (1998): Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change: Biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens, and vascular plants. Ambio 27, 322–359 / Ambio by U. Molau (1998)
  45. Müller-Wenk R (1998): Land use — The main threat to species. How to include land use in LCA. IWÖ — Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 64. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen / Land use — The main threat to species. How to include land use in LCA / IWÖ — Diskussionsbeitrag by R. Müller-Wenk (1998)
  46. Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998): The Global 200: A representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12, 502–515 (10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x) / Conservation Biology by D.M. Olson (1998)
  47. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’amico JD, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettemgel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001): Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience 51, 933–938 (10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2) / BioScience by D.M. Olson (2001)
  48. Peter D, Krokowski K, Bresky J, Petterssn B, Bradley M, Woodtli H, Nehm F (1998): LCA graphic paper and print products (part 1, long version). Infras AG (Zürich), Axel Springer Verlag AG (Hamburg), Stora (Falun, Viersen) and Canfor (Vancouver)
  49. Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JH, Broks TM (1995): The future of biodiversity. Science 269, 347–350 (10.1126/science.269.5222.347) / Science by S.L. Pimm (1995)
  50. Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC, Gibbons DW (1993): Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335–337 (10.1038/365335a0) / Nature by J.R. Prendergast (1993)
  51. Påhlsson L (ed) (1998): Vegetationstyper i Norden. (Vegetation types in the Nordic countries). TemaNord 1998:510. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen
  52. Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, LeRoy Poff N, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000): Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (10.1126/science.287.5459.1770) / Science by O.E. Sala (2000)
  53. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991): Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology 5, 18–32 (10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x) / Conservation Biology by D.A. Saunders (1991)
  54. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker IM, Bishop JG (1994): Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75, 584–606 (10.2307/1941718) / Ecology by D.W. Schemske (1994)
  55. Scholes RJ, Biggs R (2005): A biodiversity intactness index. Nature 434, 45–49 (10.1038/nature03289) / Nature by R.J. Scholes (2005)
  56. Schweinle J (ed), Doka G, Hillier B, Kaila S, Köllner T, Kreißig J, Muys B, Quijano JG, Salpakivi-Salomaa P, Swan G, Wessman H (2002): The assessment of environmental impacts caused by land use in the life cycle assessment of forestry and forest products. Final report of working group 2 ‘Land use’ of COST Action E9 ‘Life cycle assessment of forestry and forest products’. Mitteilungen der Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forstund Holzwirtschaft Nr. 209, Hamburg
  57. Seppälä J, Melanen M, Jouttijärvi T, Kauppi L, Leikola N (1998): Forest industry and the environment: A life cycle assessment study from Finland. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 23, 87–105 (10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00012-3) / Resources, Conservation and Recycling by J. Seppälä (1998)
  58. Siitonen J (2001): Forest management, coarse wood debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins 49, 11–41 / Ecological Bulletins by J. Siitonen (2001)
  59. Stokland JN, Eriksen R, Tomter SM, Korhonen K, Tomppo E, Rajaniemi S, Söderberg U, Toet H, Riis-Nielsen T (2003): Forest biodiversity indicators in the Nordic countries. Status based on national forest inventories. TemaNord 2003:514. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen / TemaNord by J.N. Stokland (2003)
  60. Sverdrup-Tygeson A, Framstad E, Svarstad H (2004): Environmental revolution in the forest? An assessment of ‘Living Forests’ in the certification of Norwegian forestry. NINA Oppdragsmelding 849. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim (in Norwegian with English summary) / Environmental revolution in the forest? An assessment of ‘Living Forests’ in the certification of Norwegian forestry / NINA Oppdragsmelding by A. Sverdrup-Tygeson (2004)
  61. The Swedish FSC Council (2000): Svensk FSC-standard för certifiering av skogsbruk. 〈 http://www.fsc-sverige.org/Portals/1/Dokument/Fsc-sv.pdf_1.pdf 〉 (in Swedish)
  62. Tilman D (1982): Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey / Resource competition and community structure by D. Tilman (1982)
  63. Udo de Haes HA (2006): How to approach land use in LCIA or, how to avoid the Cinderella effect? Comments on ‘Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA’. Int J LCA 11, 219–221 (10.1065/lca2006.07.257) / Int J LCA by H.A. Udo de Haes (2006)
  64. UNEP — United Nations Environment Programme (1992): Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and annexes. UNEP, Geneva / Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and annexes by UNEP — United Nations Environment Programme (1992)
  65. UNEP — United Nations Environment Programme (2002): Global Environmental Outlook 3. UNEP/Earthscan Publications, London / Global Environmental Outlook 3 by UNEP — United Nations Environment Programme (2002)
  66. Weidema BP, Lindeijer E (2001): Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment. Final report of the EURENVIRON-LCAGAPS subproject on land use. Depertment of Manufacturing Engeneering and Managament, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby / Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment. Final report of the EURENVIRON-LCAGAPS subproject on land use by B.P. Weidema (2001)
Dates
Type When
Created 17 years, 1 month ago (June 25, 2008, 10:53 a.m.)
Deposited 5 years, 9 months ago (Nov. 5, 2019, 11:25 a.m.)
Indexed 1 year ago (Aug. 3, 2024, 1:32 p.m.)
Issued 18 years, 4 months ago (April 16, 2007)
Published 18 years, 4 months ago (April 16, 2007)
Published Online 18 years, 4 months ago (April 16, 2007)
Published Print 17 years, 7 months ago (Jan. 1, 2008)
Funders 0

None

@article{Michelsen_2007, title={Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity: Proposal of a new methodology exemplified with forestry operations in Norway}, volume={13}, ISSN={1614-7502}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.04.316}, DOI={10.1065/lca2007.04.316}, number={1}, journal={The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Michelsen, Ottar}, year={2007}, month=apr, pages={22–31} }