10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.006
Crossref journal-article
Elsevier BV
Cell (78)
Authors 1
  1. Kim Nasmyth (first)
References 25 Referenced 126
  1. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01257-2 / Trends Biochem. Sci. / The HORMA domain: a common structural denominator in mitotic checkpoints, chromosome synapsis and DNA repair by Aravind (1998)
  2. 10.1083/jcb.143.2.283 / J. Cell Biol. / Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores by Chen (1998)
  3. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038 / Curr. Biol. / The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint by De Antoni (2005)
  4. 10.1101/gad.12.12.1871 / Genes Dev. / The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation by Fang (1998)
  5. 10.1002/bies.10361 / Bioessays / Building and breaking bridges between sister chromatids by Haering (2003)
  6. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.053 / Curr. Biol. / Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells by Howell (2004)
  7. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3 / Cell / S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function by Hoyt (1991)
  8. 10.1126/science.279.5353.1041 / Science / Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint by Hwang (1998)
  9. 10.1126/science.279.5353.1045 / Science / Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint by Kim (1998)
  10. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5 / Cell / Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast by Li (1991)
  11. 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12431 / Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA / MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity by Li (1997)
  12. 10.1038/73338 / Nat. Struct. Biol. / Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its interaction with Cdc20 by Luo (2000)
  13. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00435-X / Mol. Cell / The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20 by Luo (2002)
  14. 10.1038/nsmb748 / Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. / The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states by Luo (2004)
  15. 10.1146/annurev.ge.28.120194.001123 / Annu. Rev. Genet. / Sister-chromatid cohesion in mitosis and meiosis by Miyazaki (1994)
  16. 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241 / J. Cell Biol. / Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension by Nicklas (1994)
  17. 10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301 / J. Cell Biol. / Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle by Rieder (1994)
  18. {'key': '10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.006_bib18', 'first-page': '942', 'article-title': 'Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing', 'volume': '14', 'author': 'Shah', 'year': '2004', 'journal-title': 'Curr. Biol.'} / Curr. Biol. / Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing by Shah (2004)
  19. 10.1093/emboj/20.22.6371 / EMBO J. / Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint by Sironi (2001)
  20. 10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496 / EMBO J. / Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a “safety belt” binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint by Sironi (2002)
  21. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00451-1 / Curr. Biol. / Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast by Stern (2001)
  22. 10.1083/jcb.200102093 / J. Cell Biol. / Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2 by Sudakin (2001)
  23. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00633-5 / Cell / Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Auora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections by Tanaka (2002)
  24. 10.1083/jcb.141.5.1181 / J. Cell Biol. / Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension by Waters (1998)
  25. 10.1101/gad.13.16.2039 / Genes Dev. / Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex by Zachariae (1999)
Dates
Type When
Created 20 years, 5 months ago (March 25, 2005, 7:18 a.m.)
Deposited 3 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 29, 2021, 8:51 p.m.)
Indexed 2 months ago (July 2, 2025, 2:32 p.m.)
Issued 20 years, 6 months ago (March 1, 2005)
Published 20 years, 6 months ago (March 1, 2005)
Published Print 20 years, 6 months ago (March 1, 2005)
Funders 0

None

@article{Nasmyth_2005, title={How Do so Few Control so Many?}, volume={120}, ISSN={0092-8674}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.006}, DOI={10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.006}, number={6}, journal={Cell}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Nasmyth, Kim}, year={2005}, month=mar, pages={739–746} }