Crossref journal-article
Elsevier BV
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (78)
Bibliography

Hann, M. M., & Oprea, T. I. (2004). Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 8(3), 255–263.

Authors 2
  1. Mike M Hann (first)
  2. Tudor I Oprea (additional)
References 54 Referenced 439
  1. 10.1016/S1359-6446(98)01252-5 / Drug Discov Today / Innovation deficit revisited: reflections on the productivity of pharmaceutical R&D by Drews (1998)
  2. 10.1126/science.287.5460.1960 / Science / Drug discovery: a historical perspective by Drews (2000)
  3. 10.1177/014107680009300702 / J R Soc Med / Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry by Horrobin (2000)
  4. Sneader W: Drug prototypes and their exploitation. Chichester: Wiley, 1996.
  5. {'key': '10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.04.003_BIB5', 'first-page': '189', 'article-title': 'Serendipity and structured research in drug discovery', 'volume': '30', 'author': 'DeStevens', 'year': '1986', 'journal-title': 'Prog Drug Res'} / Prog Drug Res / Serendipity and structured research in drug discovery by DeStevens (1986)
  6. 10.1021/ci000403i / J Chem Inf Comput Sci / Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery by Hann (2001)
  7. 10.1021/ci010366a / J Chem Inf Comput Sci / Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective by Oprea (2001)
  8. Oprea TI: Cheminformatics and the quest for leads in drug discovery. In Handbook of Cheminformatics vol. 4. Edited by Gasteiger J, Engel T. New York: VCH-Wiley; 2003:1508-1531. (10.1002/9783527618279.ch44b)
  9. 10.1016/S0065-7743(08)61100-8 / Annu Rep Med Chem / Cheminformatics: what is it and how does it impact drug discovery by Brown (1998)
  10. 10.1038/nrd1012 / Nat Rev Drug Discov / Modern biomedical research: an internally self-consistent universe with little contact with medical reality? by Horrobin (2003)
  11. 10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1 / Adv Drug Deliv Rev / Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings by Lipinski (1997)
  12. Boyd DB: Progress in the rational design of therapeutically interesting compounds. In Rational Molecular Design in Drug Research. Edited by Liljefors T, Jorgensen FS, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Copenhagen: MUNKSGAARD; 1998:15-29.
  13. 10.1023/A:1020877402759 / J Comput Aided Mol Des / Lead structure searching: are we looking at the appropriate property? by Oprea (2002)
  14. Machin P: Designing drugs - where next? In EuroQSAR 2002 - Designing Drugs and Crop Protectants: Processes, Problems and Solutions. Edited by Ford M, Livingstone D, Dearden J, Van de Waterbeemd H. New York: Blackwell Publishing; 2003:1-4.
  15. Oprea TI, Li J, Muresan S, Mattes KC: High throughput and virtual screening: choosing the appropriate leads. In EuroQSAR 2002 - Designing Drugs and Crop Protectants: Processes, Problems and Solutions. Edited by Ford M, Livingstone D, Dearden J, Van de Waterbeemd H. New York: Blackwell Publishing; 2003:40-47.
  16. 10.1016/S1359644602025722 / Drug Discov Today / Nonleadlikeness and leadlikeness in biochemical screening by Rishton (2003)
  17. 10.1021/jm010533y / J Med Chem / A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening by McGovern (2002)
  18. 10.1021/jm010934d / J Med Chem / Development of a virtual screening method for identification of ‘frequent hitters’ in compound libraries by Roche (2002)
  19. 10.1177/108705710200700303 / J Biomol Screen / The confirmation rate of primary hits: A predictive model by Fogel (2002)
  20. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199601)16:1<3::AID-MED1>3.0.CO;2-6 / Med Res Rev / The art and practice of structure-based drug design: a molecular modeling perspective by Bohacek (1996)
  21. The ChemNavigator homepage on http://www.chemnavigator.com
  22. According to the PhRMA: (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America) website on http://www.phrma.org/issues/researchdev/
  23. Weininger D: Combinatorics of small molecular structures. In Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 1. Edited by Von Ragué Schleyer P. New York: Wiley; 1998:425-430. (10.1002/0470845015.cna014m)
  24. 10.1002/jhet.5570370324 / J Heterocycl Chem / Finding drug candidates in virtual and lost/emerging chemistry by De Laet (2000)
  25. Ajay, Walters WP, Murcko MA: Can we learn to distinguish between ‘drug-like’ and ‘nondrug-like’ molecules?. J Med Chem 1998, 41:3314-3324. (10.1021/jm970666c)
  26. 10.1021/jm9706776 / J Med Chem / A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs by Sadowski (1998)
  27. WDI: the Derwent World Drug Index, is available from Daylight Chemical Information Systems at http://www.daylight.com
  28. MDDR and ACD are available from MDL Information Systems: http://www.mdli.com/products/finders/database_finder/index.jsp. MDDR is developed in cooperation with Prous Science Publishers at http://www.prous.com/index.html
  29. 10.1021/ci990266t / J Chem Inf Comput Sci / Potential drugs and nondrugs: prediction and identification of important structural features by Wagener (2000)
  30. 10.1021/ci0003810 / J Chem Inf Comput Sci / Improving the odds in discriminating “druglike” from “nondruglike” compounds by Frimurer (2000)
  31. 10.1021/jm011027b / J Med Chem / Descriptors, physical properties and drug-likeness by Brüstle (2002)
  32. 10.1023/A:1008130001697 / J Comput Aided Mol Des / Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases by Oprea (2000)
  33. 10.1021/jm030267j / J Med Chem / Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs by Vieth (2004)
  34. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19991216)38:24<3743::AID-ANIE3743>3.0.CO;2-U / Angew Chem Int Ed Engl / The design of leadlike combinatorial libraries by Teague (1999)
  35. 10.1016/S0960-894X(02)00244-5 / Bioorg Med Chem Lett / Drugs, leads, and drug-likeness: an analysis of some recently launched drugs by Proudfoot (2002)
  36. 10.1002/anie.200200539 / Angew Chem Int Ed Engl / Application and limitations of X-ray crystallographic data in structure-based ligand and drug design by Davis (2003)
  37. 10.1038/nrd1110 / Nat Rev Drug Discov / Predicting therapeutic value in the lead optimization phase of drug discovery by Kenakin (2003)
  38. 10.1016/S1056-8719(00)00107-6 / J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods / Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability by Lipinski (2000)
  39. 10.1038/nrd1156 / Nat Rev Drug Discov / Drug research: myths, hype and reality by Kubinyi (2003)
  40. The WOMBAT: (World of Molecular BioAcTivity) database, is available from Sunset Molecular Discovery at http://www.sunsetmolecular.com
  41. 10.1021/cr00020a001 / Chem Rev / Estimating LogPoct from structures by Leo (1993)
  42. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.9997 / Proc Natl Acad Sci USA / The maximal affinity of ligands by Kuntz (1999)
  43. 10.3390/70100051 / Molecules / Virtual screening in lead discovery: a viewpoint by Oprea (2002)
  44. 10.1021/ci020055f / J Chem Inf Comput Sci / Consideration of molecular weight during compound selection in virtual target-based database screening by Pan (2003)
  45. Oprea TI, Bologa C, Olah M: Compound selection for virtual screening. In Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery. Edited by Alvarez JC, Shoichet B. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004:in press. (10.1201/9781420028775.pt2)
  46. 10.1016/S1359-6446(02)02245-6 / Drug Discov Today / Structure-based screening of low-affinity compounds by Carr (2002)
  47. Milburn MV: Drug discovery on a proteomic scale. Abstracts of Papers, 224th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, August 18–22, 2002, COMP-042.
  48. 10.1107/S0909049503023975 / J Synchrotron Radiat / Leveraging structural approaches: applications of NMR-based screening and X-ray crystallography for inhibitor design by Moore (2004)
  49. Hann MM, Leach AR, Green DVS: Computational chemistry, molecular complexity and screening set design. In Cheminformatics in Drug Discovery Edited by Oprea TI. New York: Wiley-VCH: 2004:in press. (10.1002/3527603743.ch3)
  50. 10.1021/ci0003855 / J Chem Inf Comput Sci / Where are the GaPs? A rational approach to monomer acquisition and selection by Leach (2000)
  51. 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02831-9 / Drug Discov Today / A ‘Rule of Three’ for fragment-based lead discovery? by Congreve (2003)
  52. 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)03007-1 / Drug Discov Today / Molecular recognition: the fragment approach in lead generation by Fattori (2004)
  53. 10.1002/jps.10386 / J Pharm Sci / Pulmonary absorption rate and bioavailability of drugs in vivo in rats: structure-absorption relationships and physicochemical profiling of inhaled drugs by Tronde (2003)
  54. 10.2174/138620704772884832 / Comb Chem High Throughput Screen / Design of a compound screening collection for use in high-throughput screening by Harper (2004)
Dates
Type When
Created 21 years, 3 months ago (May 8, 2004, 6:30 a.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 7 months ago (Jan. 13, 2024, 4:56 a.m.)
Indexed 3 weeks, 5 days ago (July 26, 2025, 5:21 a.m.)
Issued 21 years, 2 months ago (June 1, 2004)
Published 21 years, 2 months ago (June 1, 2004)
Published Print 21 years, 2 months ago (June 1, 2004)
Funders 0

None

@article{Hann_2004, title={Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research}, volume={8}, ISSN={1367-5931}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.04.003}, DOI={10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.04.003}, number={3}, journal={Current Opinion in Chemical Biology}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Hann, Mike M and Oprea, Tudor I}, year={2004}, month=jun, pages={255–263} }