Crossref journal-article
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Empirical Software Engineering (297)
Bibliography

Segal, J. (2005). When Software Engineers Met Research Scientists: A Case Study. Empirical Software Engineering, 10(4), 517–536.

Authors 1
  1. Judith Segal (first)
References 22 Referenced 75
  1. Bache, E. 2003. Building software for scientists—a report about incremental adoption of XP. Poster presented at XP2003, Genoa, Italy.
  2. Beck, K. 2000. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. / Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change by K. Beck (2000)
  3. Boehm, B. 2002. Get ready for agile methods, with care. IEEE Computer 35(1): 64–69. (10.1109/2.976920) / IEEE Computer by B. Boehm (2002)
  4. Boehm, B., and Turner, R. 2004. Balancing Agility and Discipline. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. / Balancing Agility and Discipline by B. Boehm (2004)
  5. Bratthall, L., and Jorgensen, M. 2002. Can you trust a single data source exploratory software engineering case study? Empirical Software Engineering 7: 9–26. (10.1023/A:1014866909191) / Empirical Software Engineering by L. Bratthall (2002)
  6. Cockburn, A. 2002. Agile Software Development. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. / Agile Software Development by A. Cockburn (2002)
  7. Cockburn, A., and Williams, L. 2001. The costs and benefits of pair programming. In: G. Succi and M. Marchesi, (eds.), Extreme Programming Examined. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. / Extreme Programming Examined by A. Cockburn (2001)
  8. DeMarco, T., and Boehm, B. 2002. The agile methods fray. IEEE Computer 35(6): 90–92. (10.1109/MC.2002.1009175) / IEEE Computer by T. DeMarco (2002)
  9. Fitzgerald, B. 1998. An empirical investigation into the adoption of system development methodologies. Information and Management 34: 317–328. (10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00072-X) / Information and Management by B. Fitzgerald (1998)
  10. Glass, R. 2002. Searching for the Holy Grail of software engineering. Communications of the ACM 45(5): 15–16. (10.1145/506218.506231) / Communications of the ACM by R. Glass (2002)
  11. Glass, R. L., Vessey, I., and Ramesh, V. 2002. Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature. Information and Software Technology 44: 491–506. (10.1016/S0950-5849(02)00049-6) / Information and Software Technology by R. L. Glass (2002)
  12. Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. 1999. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1): 67–93. (10.2307/249410) / MIS Quarterly by H. K. Klein (1999)
  13. Lanubile, F. 1997. Empirical evaluation of software maintenance technologies. Empirical Software Engineering 2: 97–108. (10.1023/A:1009788914777) / Empirical Software Engineering by F. Lanubile (1997)
  14. Lee, A. S. 1989. A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. Management and Information Systems Quarterly 13(1): 33–50. (10.2307/248698) / Management and Information Systems Quarterly by A. S. Lee (1989)
  15. Paulk, M. 2002. Agile methodologies and Process Discipline. Crosstalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering 15(10): 15–18. / Crosstalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering by M. Paulk (2002)
  16. Robinson, H., Hall, P., Hovenden, F., and Rachel, J. 1998. Postmodern software development. The Computer Journal 41(6): 363–375. (10.1093/comjnl/41.6.363) / The Computer Journal by H. Robinson (1998)
  17. Robinson, H., Segal, J., and Sharp, H. 2003. The case for empirical studies of the practice of software development. In: A. Jedlitscha and M. Ciolkowski, (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop in the Workshop Series on Empirical Studies in Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 99–108.
  18. Seaman, C. 1999. Methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4): 557–572. (10.1109/32.799955) / IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering by C. Seaman (1999)
  19. Segal, J. 2004. The nature of evidence in empirical software engineering. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP) 2003, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 40–47.
  20. Segal, J., Grinyer, A., and Sharp, H. 2005. The type of evidence produced by empirical software engineers. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Realizing Evidence-Based Software Engineering, ICSE-2005, http://portal.acm.org/dl.cfm (10.1145/1083174.1083176)
  21. Wood, W. A., and Kleb, W. L. 2003. Exploring XP for scientific research. IEEE Software 20(3): 30–36. (10.1109/MS.2003.1196317) / IEEE Software by W. A. Wood (2003)
  22. Zelkowitz, M. V., Wallace, D. R., and Binkley, D. W. 2002. Experimental validation of new software technology. In: N. Juristo and A. M. Moreno, (eds.), Lecture Notes on Empirical Software Engineering, World Scientific Publishing Co, pp. 229–263.
Dates
Type When
Created 19 years, 10 months ago (Sept. 28, 2005, 5:41 p.m.)
Deposited 5 years, 4 months ago (April 9, 2020, 7:44 p.m.)
Indexed 3 months, 3 weeks ago (May 2, 2025, 2:05 p.m.)
Issued 19 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 1, 2005)
Published 19 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 1, 2005)
Published Online 19 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 5, 2005)
Published Print 19 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 1, 2005)
Funders 0

None

@article{Segal_2005, title={When Software Engineers Met Research Scientists: A Case Study}, volume={10}, ISSN={1573-7616}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-005-3865-y}, DOI={10.1007/s10664-005-3865-y}, number={4}, journal={Empirical Software Engineering}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Segal, Judith}, year={2005}, month=oct, pages={517–536} }