Crossref journal-article
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (297)
Bibliography

Dreyer, L. C., Niemann, A. L., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2003). Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(4), 191–200.

Authors 3
  1. Louise Camilla Dreyer (first)
  2. Anne Louise Niemann (additional)
  3. Michael Z. Hauschild (additional)
References 16 Referenced 353
  1. Wenzel H, Hauschild M, Airing L (1997): Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol. 1-Methodology, tools and case studies in product development. First edition. Chapman & Hall, United Kingdom, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham, MA. USA. ISBN 0-412-80800-5 (10.1007/978-1-4615-6367-9) / Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol. 1-Methodology, tools and case studies in product development by H Wenzel (1997)
  2. Guinée JB (ed) (2001): Life Cycle Assessment: An operational guide to the ISO Standards; LCA in Perspective; Guide; Operational Annex to Guide. Centre for Environmental Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands. May 2001 / Life Cycle Assessment: An operational guide to the ISO Standards; LCA in Perspective; Guide; Operational Annex to Guide (2001)
  3. Goedkoop M, Effting S, Collignon M (2000): The Eco-indicator 99-A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Manual for Designers. Second edition 17-4-2000. PRé Consultants B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands
  4. Udo de Haes HA (ed.) (1996): Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC-Europe), Brussels, 1996 / Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment (1996)
  5. Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Int J LCA 4 (2) 1–15, 1999 / Int J LCA by HA Udo de Haes (1999)
  6. Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Herrwich E, Hofstetter P, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Mueller-Wenk R, Olsen S, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B (eds): Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards best practice. SETAC, Pensacola, 2002 / Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards best practice (2002)
  7. ISO Standard 14042-Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Life cycle impact assessment. First edition 2000-03-01. Reference number ISO 14042:2000(E). International Organisation of Standardisation, Switzerland
  8. Hauschild M, Potting J (2003): Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment-the EDIP2000 methodology. Guidelines from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency No. xxx 2003, Copenhagen (in press)
  9. Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998): Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol. 2, Scientific Background. First edition. Chapman & Hall, United Kingdom, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham, MA. USA. ISBN 0412-80810-2 / Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol. 2, Scientific Background by M Hauschild (1998)
  10. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000): The Eco-indicator 99-A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology Report. Second edition 17-4-2000. PRé Consultants B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands
  11. Guinée JB (ed) (2001): Life Cycle Assessment: An operational guide to the ISO Standards; Scientific background. Centre for Environmental Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands, May 2001 / Life Cycle Assessment: An operational guide to the ISO Standards; Scientific background (2001)
  12. Huijbregts M (1999): Priority assessment of toxic substances in LCA. Development and application of the multimedia fate, exposure and effect model USES-LCA. IVAM Environmental Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands / Priority assessment of toxic substances in LCA. Development and application of the multimedia fate, exposure and effect model USES-LCA by M Huijbregts (1999)
  13. Dreyer LC, Niemann AL (2001): Life Cycle Assessment of UV-lacquers and Comparison of Three Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Master Thesis IPL-099-01. Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, August 2001 / Life Cycle Assessment of UV-lacquers and Comparison of Three Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods by LC Dreyer (2001)
  14. Hauschild M, Pennington D (2002): Indicators for ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Chapter 6 in Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen, SI, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B (eds): Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards best practice. ISBN 1-880611-54-6, SETAC Press, Pensacola, Florida / Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards best practice by M Hauschild (2002)
  15. OMNIITOX: Operational Models aNd Information tools for Industrial applications of eco/TOXicological impact assessments (http://www.omniitox.net/)
  16. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative: http://www.uneptie.org/pc/sustain/lcinitiative/home. htm
Dates
Type When
Created 16 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 23, 2008, 10:10 p.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 5 months ago (March 1, 2024, 7:07 p.m.)
Indexed 6 days, 15 hours ago (Aug. 23, 2025, 9:37 p.m.)
Issued 22 years, 1 month ago (July 1, 2003)
Published 22 years, 1 month ago (July 1, 2003)
Published Print 22 years, 1 month ago (July 1, 2003)
Funders 0

None

@article{Dreyer_2003, title={Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99: Does it matter which one you choose?}, volume={8}, ISSN={1614-7502}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02978471}, DOI={10.1007/bf02978471}, number={4}, journal={The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Dreyer, Louise Camilla and Niemann, Anne Louise and Hauschild, Michael Z.}, year={2003}, month=jul, pages={191–200} }