The Role of Qsar Methodology in the Regulatory Assessment of Chemicals
10.1007/978-1-4020-9783-6_13
Crossref book-chapter
Springer Netherlands
Challenges and Advances in Computational Chemistry and Physics (297)
Bibliography

Worth, A. P. (2009). The Role of Qsar Methodology in the Regulatory Assessment of Chemicals. Recent Advances in QSAR Studies, 367–382.

Authors 1
  1. Andrew Paul Worth (first)
References 50 Referenced 21
  1. European Commission (2006a) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 396/1 of 30.12.2006. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg
  2. European Commission (2006b) Directive 2006/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances in order to adapt it to Regulation
  3. (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Official Journal of the European Union, L 396/850 of 30.12.2006. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg
  4. European Commission (1998) Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Official Journal of the European Union, L 132/1 of 24.04.1998. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg
  5. European Commission (1991) Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European Union, L 230/1 of 19.08.1991. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg
  6. European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union, L 327/1 of 22.12.2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg
  7. European Commission (1976) Council Directive 76/768 of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union, L 262/169 of 27.09.1976. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg
  8. Van Leeuwen CJ, Patlewicz GY, Worth AP (2007) Intelligent testing strategies. In: Van Leeuwen CJ, Vermeire TG (eds) Risk assessment of chemicals. An introduction, 2nd edn. Springer Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 46–509 (10.1007/978-1-4020-6102-8) / Risk assessment of chemicals. An introduction by CJ Leeuwen Van (2007)
  9. Grindon C, Combes R, Cronin MT et al. (2006) Integrated testing strategies for use in the EU REACH system. ATLA 34:407–427 / ATLA by C Grindon (2006)
  10. Hoffmann S, Gallegos Saliner A, Patlewicz G et al. (2008) A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals. Toxicol Lett 180:9–20 (10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.004) / Toxicol Lett by S Hoffmann (2008)
  11. Lessigiarska IV, Worth AP, Netzeva TI et al. (2006) Quantitative structure–activity–activity and quantitative structure–activity investigations of human and rodent toxicity. Chemosphere 65:1878–1887 (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.067) / Chemosphere by IV Lessigiarska (2006)
  12. Dearden JC, Barratt MD, Benigni R et al. (1997) The development and validation of expert systems for predicting toxicity. The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ECB workshop (ECVAM workshop 24). ATLA 25:223–252 / ATLA by JC Dearden (1997)
  13. OECD (2007) Guidance on grouping of chemicals. ENV/JM/MONO(2007)28 Series on Testing and Assessment Number 80, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France. Available at: http://www.oecd.org /
  14. ECHA (2008) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: http://reach.jrc.it/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_en.htm/
  15. OECD (2007) Report on the Regulatory Uses and Applications in OECD Member Countries of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models in the Assessment of New and Existing Chemicals. ENV/JM/MONO(2006)25, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/
  16. Worth A, Patlewicz G (eds) (2007) A Compendium of Case Studies that helped to shape the REACH guidance on chemical categories and read across. European Commission report EUR 22481 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Available at: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/qsar/publications/
  17. Worth A, Bassan A, Fabjan E et al.(2007) The use of computational methods in the grouping and assessment of chemicals – preliminary investigations. European Commission report EUR 22941 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2007. Available at: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/qsar/publications/
  18. Patlewicz G, Jeliazkova N, Gallegos Saliner A et al. (2008) Toxmatch – a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:397–412 (10.1080/10629360802083848) / SAR QSAR Environ Res by G Patlewicz (2008)
  19. Gallegos Saliner A, Poater A, Jeliazkova N et al. (2008) Toxmatch – A chemical classification and activity prediction tool based on similarity measures. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 52:77–84 (10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.012) / Regul Toxicol Pharmacol by A Gallegos Saliner (2008)
  20. Pavan M, Worth A (2008) A set of case studies to illustrate the applicability of DART (Decision Analysis by Ranking Techniques) in the ranking of chemicals. European Commission report EUR 23481 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2008. Available at: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/qsar/publications/
  21. Bassan A, Worth AP (2007) Computational tools for regulatory needs. In: Ekins S (ed) Computational toxicology: Risk assessment for pharmaceutical and environmental chemicals. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp 751–775 (10.1002/9780470145890.ch27) / Computational toxicology: Risk assessment for pharmaceutical and environmental chemicals by A Bassan (2007)
  22. Bassan A, Worth AP (2008) The integrated use of models for the properties and effects of chemicals by means of a structured workflow. QSAR Comb Sci 27:6–20 (10.1002/qsar.200710119) / QSAR Comb Sci by A Bassan (2008)
  23. OECD (2007) Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure activity relationship [(Q)SAR] models. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 69. ENV/JM/MONO(2007)2. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France. Available at: http://www.oecd.org /
  24. OECD (2004) The report from the expert group on (quantitative) structure activity relationship ([Q]SARs) on the principles for the validation of (Q)SARs, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 49 (ENV/JM/MONO(2004)24). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France. Available at: http://www.oecd.org /
  25. Jaworska JS, Comber M, Auer C et al. (2003) Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. Environ Health Perspect 111:1358–1360 (10.1289/ehp.5757) / Environ Health Perspect by JS Jaworska (2003)
  26. Eriksson L, Jaworska JS, Worth AP et al. (2003) Methods for reliability, uncertainty assessment, and applicability evaluations of classification and regression based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect 111:1361–1375 (10.1289/ehp.5758) / Environ Health Perspect by L Eriksson (2003)
  27. Cronin MTD, Walker JD, Jaworska JS et al. (2003) Use of quantitative structure-activity relationships in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances. Environ Health Perspect 111:1376–1390 (10.1289/ehp.5759) / Environ Health Perspect by MTD Cronin (2003)
  28. Cronin MTD, Jaworska JS, Walker J et al. (2003) Use of quantitative structure-activity relationships in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. Environ Health Perspect 111:1391–1401 (10.1289/ehp.5760) / Environ Health Perspect by MTD Cronin (2003)
  29. JRC QSAR Model Database. http://qsardb.jrc.it
  30. Netzeva TI, Worth AP Aldenberg T et al. (2005) Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 52. ATLA 33:155–173 / ATLA by TI Netzeva (2005)
  31. Pavan M, Worth AP (2008) Review of estimation models for biodegradation. QSAR Comb Sci 27:32–40 (10.1002/qsar.200710117) / QSAR Comb Sci by M Pavan (2008)
  32. Patlewicz G, Aptula AO, Roberts DW, Uriarte E (2008) A minireview of available skin sensitization (Q)SARs/expert systems. QSAR Comb Sci 27:60–76 (10.1002/qsar.200710067) / QSAR Comb Sci by G Patlewicz (2008)
  33. Worth AP, Bassan A, de Bruijn J et al. (2007) The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18:111–125 (10.1080/10629360601054255) / SAR QSAR Environ Res by AP Worth (2007)
  34. JRC QSAR Tools. http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/qsar/qsar-tools /
  35. OECD QSAR Application Toolbox. http://www.oecd.org/env/existingchemicals/qsar /
  36. AMBIT Software. http://sourceforge.net/projects/ambit /
  37. Pavan M, Worth A (2008) Publicly-accessible QSAR software tools developed by the Joint Research Centre. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:785–799 (10.1080/10629360802550390) / SAR QSAR Environ Res by M Pavan (2008)
  38. Enoch SJ, Hewitt M, Cronin MT et al. (2008) Classification of chemicals according to mechanism of aquatic toxicity: An evaluation of the implementation of the Verhaar scheme in Toxtree. Chemosphere 73:243–248 (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.052) / Chemosphere by SJ Enoch (2008)
  39. Benigni R, Bossa C, Jeliazkova N et al. (2008) The Benigni/Bossa rulebase for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity – a module of Toxtree, European Commission report EUR 23241 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
  40. Patlewicz G, Jeliazkova N, Safford RJ et al. (2008) An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:397–412 (10.1080/10629360802083848) / SAR QSAR Environ Res by G Patlewicz (2008)
  41. Jaworska J, Nikolova-Jeliazkova N (2007) How can structural similarity analysis help in category formation. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18:195–207 (10.1080/10629360701306050) / SAR QSAR Environ Res by J Jaworska (2007)
  42. Combes R, Grindon C, Cronin MT et al. (2007) Proposed integrated decision-tree testing strategies for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in relation to the EU REACH legislation. ATLA 35:267–287 / ATLA by R Combes (2007)
  43. Grindon C, Combes R, Cronin MT et al. (2007a) Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for skin corrosion and irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. ATLA 35:673–682 / ATLA by C Grindon (2007)
  44. Grindon C, Combes R, Cronin MT et al. (2007b) An integrated decision-tree testing strategy for skin sensitisation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. ATLA 35:683–697 / ATLA by C Grindon (2007)
  45. Combes R, Grindon C, Cronin MT et al. (2008) Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for acute systemic toxicity and toxicokinetics with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. ATLA 36:45–63 / ATLA by R Combes (2008)
  46. Grindon C, Combes R, Cronin MT et al. (2008a) Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. ATLA 36:65–80 / ATLA by C Grindon (2008)
  47. Grindon C, Combes R, Cronin MT et al. (2008b) An integrated decision-tree testing strategy for eye irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. ATLA 36:81–92 / ATLA by C Grindon (2008)
  48. Grindon C, Combes R, Cronin MT et al. (2008c) An integrated decision-tree testing strategy for repeat dose toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. ATLA 36:93–101 / ATLA by C Grindon (2008)
  49. Barlow S (2005) Threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) – A tool for assessing substances of unknown toxicity present at low levels in the diet. ILSI Europe Concise Monographs Series, International Life Sciences Institute, Brussels, 2005. Available at: http://europe.ilsi.org/publications/Monographs/
  50. OSIRIS Project http://www.osiris-reach.eu/
Dates
Type When
Created 15 years, 10 months ago (Nov. 4, 2009, 4:49 p.m.)
Deposited 5 years, 11 months ago (Sept. 25, 2019, 2:37 p.m.)
Indexed 2 months, 1 week ago (June 27, 2025, 3:29 a.m.)
Issued 15 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 30, 2009)
Published 15 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 30, 2009)
Published Online 15 years, 10 months ago (Oct. 30, 2009)
Published Print 15 years, 8 months ago (Jan. 1, 2010)
Funders 0

None

@inbook{Worth_2009, title={The Role of Qsar Methodology in the Regulatory Assessment of Chemicals}, ISBN={9781402097836}, ISSN={2542-4483}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9783-6_13}, DOI={10.1007/978-1-4020-9783-6_13}, booktitle={Recent Advances in QSAR Studies}, publisher={Springer Netherlands}, author={Worth, Andrew Paul}, year={2009}, month=oct, pages={367–382} }