Abstract
AbstractWe have compared structures of 78 proteins determined by both NMR and X‐ray methods. It is shown that X‐ray and NMR structures of the same protein have more differences than various X‐ray structures obtained for the protein, and even more than various NMR structures of the protein. X‐ray and NMR structures of 18 of these 78 proteins have obvious large‐scale structural differences that seem to reflect a difference of crystal and solution structures. The other 60 pairs of structures have only small‐scale differences comparable with differences between various X‐ray or various NMR structures of a protein; we have analyzed these structures more attentively. One of the main differences between NMR and X‐ray structures concerns the number of contacts per residue: (1) NMR structures presented in PDB have more contacts than X‐ray structures at distances below 3.0 Å and 4.5–6.5 Å, and fewer contacts at distances of 3.0–4.5 Å and 6.5–8.0 Å; (2) this difference in the number of contacts is greater for internal residues than for external ones, and it is larger for β‐containing proteins than for all‐α proteins. Another significant difference is that the main‐chain hydrogen bonds identified in X‐ray and NMR structures often differ. Their correlation is 69% only. However, analogous difference is found for refined and rerefined NMR structures, allowing us to suggest that the observed difference in interresidue contacts of X‐ray and NMR structures of the same proteins is due mainly to a difference in mathematical treatment of experimental results. Proteins 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography
Garbuzynskiy, S. O., Melnik, B. S., Lobanov, M. Yu., Finkelstein, A. V., & Galzitskaya, O. V. (2005). Comparison of Xâray and NMR structures: Is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between Xârayâ and NMRâresolved protein structures? Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 60(1), 139â147. Portico.
References
23
Referenced
73
10.1023/A:1008335423527
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991115)37:3<404::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-2
10.1002/prot.1075
10.1023/A:1014971029663
10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11885.x
10.1017/S0033583500004261
10.1006/jmbi.1998.1631
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990501)35:2<184::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-W
10.1107/S090744490101825X
10.1002/pro.5560041016
10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.018
10.1002/prot.20118
10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80134-2
10.1007/978-1-4612-6137-7
10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
10.1002/bip.360221211
10.1093/bioinformatics/16.9.776
{'key': 'e_1_2_6_19_2', 'volume-title': 'Program FITT for rmsd calculation', 'author': 'Finkelstein AV', 'year': '1987'}
/ Program FITT for rmsd calculation by Finkelstein AV (1987)10.1107/S0108767386099786
{'key': 'e_1_2_6_21_2', 'volume-title': 'Statistics. Lectures on elementary statistics and probability', 'author': 'Hudson DJ', 'year': '1964'}
/ Statistics. Lectures on elementary statistics and probability by Hudson DJ (1964)10.1006/jmbi.2000.3750
10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03208-2
{'key': 'e_1_2_6_24_2', 'volume-title': 'X‐PLOR, version 3.1 manual', 'author': 'Brunger AT', 'year': '1992'}
/ X‐PLOR, version 3.1 manual by Brunger AT (1992)
Dates
Type | When |
---|---|
Created | 20 years, 3 months ago (April 26, 2005, 1:50 p.m.) |
Deposited | 1 year, 10 months ago (Oct. 16, 2023, 12:29 a.m.) |
Indexed | 3 weeks, 2 days ago (Aug. 2, 2025, 12:07 a.m.) |
Issued | 20 years, 3 months ago (April 26, 2005) |
Published | 20 years, 3 months ago (April 26, 2005) |
Published Online | 20 years, 3 months ago (April 26, 2005) |
Published Print | 20 years, 1 month ago (July 1, 2005) |
@article{Garbuzynskiy_2005, title={Comparison of X‐ray and NMR structures: Is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X‐ray‐ and NMR‐resolved protein structures?}, volume={60}, ISSN={1097-0134}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.20491}, DOI={10.1002/prot.20491}, number={1}, journal={Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Garbuzynskiy, Sergiy O. and Melnik, Bogdan S. and Lobanov, Michail Yu. and Finkelstein, Alexei V. and Galzitskaya, Oxana V.}, year={2005}, month=apr, pages={139–147} }