Crossref journal-article
Wiley
PROTEOMICS (311)
Abstract

AbstractProteome analysis by gel‐free “shotgun” proteomics relies on the simplification of a peptide mixture before it is analyzed in a mass spectrometer. While separation on a reverse‐phase (RP) liquid chromatographic column is widely employed, a variety of other methods have been used to fractionate both proteins and peptides before this step. We compared six different protein and peptide fractionation workflows, using Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, a useful model cyanobacterium for potential exploitation to improve its production of hydrogen and other secondary metabolites. Pre‐digestion protein separation was performed by strip‐based isoelectric focusing, one‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, or weak anion exchange chromatography, while pre‐RP peptide separation was accomplished by isoelectric focusing (IEF) or strong cation exchange chromatography. Peptides were identified using electrospray ionization quadrupole time of flight‐tandem mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectra were analyzed using ProID software employing both a single organism database and the entire NCBI non‐redundant database, and a total of 776 proteins were identified using a stringent set of selection criteria. Method comparisons were made on the basis of the results obtained (number and types of proteins identified), as well as ease of use and other practical aspects. IEF‐IEF protein and peptide fractionation prior to RP gave the best overall performance.

Bibliography

Gan, C. S., Reardon, K. F., & Wright, P. C. (2005). Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PROTEOMICS, 5(9), 2468–2478. Portico.

Authors 3
  1. Chee Sian Gan (first)
  2. Kenneth F. Reardon (additional)
  3. Phillip C. Wright (additional)
References 61 Referenced 77
  1. 10.1038/10890
  2. 10.1038/85686
  3. 10.1021/pr034109s
  4. 10.1007/s00216-003-2329-8
  5. 10.1038/13690
  6. 10.1002/jms.229
  7. 10.1021/pr025556v
  8. 10.1021/ac040022u
  9. 10.1021/pr0340431
  10. 10.1021/ac034014
  11. 10.1002/elps.200305700
  12. 10.1038/nbt1196-1579
  13. 10.1021/ac9901182
  14. 10.1002/pmic.200300472
  15. 10.1002/elps.200305792
  16. 10.1021/ac961156d
  17. 10.1006/abio.1998.2588
  18. 10.1021/pr034038x
  19. 10.1016/S0165-022X(03)00055-1
  20. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991001)20:14<2970::AID-ELPS2970>3.0.CO;2-P
  21. 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90609-D
  22. 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)00532-5
  23. 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.11.036
  24. 10.1002/1615-9861(200101)1:1<42::AID-PROT42>3.0.CO;2-J
  25. 10.1016/S1570-0232(03)00428-8
  26. 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.05.007
  27. 10.1002/elps.200390021
  28. 10.1002/1615-9861(200212)2:12<1652::AID-PROT1652>3.0.CO;2-3
  29. 10.1002/1522-2683(200011)21:17<3639::AID-ELPS3639>3.0.CO;2-V
  30. 10.1073/pnas.0404720101
  31. 10.1002/pmic.200300586
  32. 10.1385/CP:1:2:101
  33. 10.1074/mcp.M200037-MCP200
  34. 10.1002/elps.1150180806
  35. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990801)20:11<2160::AID-ELPS2160>3.0.CO;2-#
  36. 10.1074/mcp.M200043-MCP200
  37. 10.1074/mcp.M300137-MCP200
  38. 10.1002/1615-9861(200212)2:12<1735::AID-PROT1735>3.0.CO;2-K
  39. 10.1104/pp.103.032326
  40. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01642.x
  41. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000501)21:9<1746::AID-ELPS1746>3.0.CO;2-O
  42. 10.1007/s00425-003-1113-5
  43. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.08.008
  44. 10.1007/s002530000450
  45. 10.1007/s002030050629
  46. {'key': 'e_1_2_1_47_2', 'first-page': '84', 'author': 'Miyake M.', 'year': '2000', 'journal-title': 'Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.'} / Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. by Miyake M. (2000)
  47. 10.1007/s00203-002-0446-y
  48. 10.1074/mcp.M300026-MCP200
  49. 10.1002/pmic.200300449
  50. 10.1002/elps.200305909
  51. 10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00921-X
  52. 10.1002/1615-9861(200209)2:9<1169::AID-PROT1169>3.0.CO;2-L
  53. 10.1021/ac001332p
  54. 10.1016/S0021-9673(04)01204-X
  55. 10.1021/pr0340431
  56. 10.1002/elps.200305722
  57. 10.1021/ac026153h
  58. 10.1093/nar/gkg536
  59. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000501)21:9<1635::AID-ELPS1635>3.0.CO;2-1
  60. 10.1002/pmic.200300801
  61. 10.1074/jbc.M106510200
Dates
Type When
Created 20 years, 3 months ago (May 9, 2005, 6:47 a.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 11 months ago (Sept. 12, 2023, 9:30 p.m.)
Indexed 1 year, 1 month ago (Aug. 2, 2024, 4:31 a.m.)
Issued 20 years, 3 months ago (June 1, 2005)
Published 20 years, 3 months ago (June 1, 2005)
Published Online 20 years, 3 months ago (June 2, 2005)
Published Print 20 years, 3 months ago (June 1, 2005)
Funders 0

None

@article{Gan_2005, title={Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803}, volume={5}, ISSN={1615-9861}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401266}, DOI={10.1002/pmic.200401266}, number={9}, journal={PROTEOMICS}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Gan, Chee Sian and Reardon, Kenneth F. and Wright, Phillip C.}, year={2005}, month=jun, pages={2468–2478} }