Crossref journal-article
Wiley
Molecular Informatics (311)
Abstract

AbstractIn the present study, 21 validated QSAR models that discriminate compounds with high Caco‐2 permeability (Papp≥8×10−6 cm/s) from those with moderate‐poor permeability (Papp<8×10−6 cm/s) were developed on a novel large dataset of 674 compounds. 20 DRAGON descriptor families were used. The global accuracies of obtained models were ranking between 78–82 %. A general model combining all types of molecular descriptors was developed and it classified correctly 81.56 % and 83.94 % for training and test sets, respectively. An external set of 10 compounds was predicted and 80 % was correctly assessed by in vitro Caco‐2 assays. The potential use of the final model was evaluated by a virtual screening of a human intestinal absorption database of 269 compounds. The model predicted 121 compounds with high Caco‐2 permeability and the 90 % of them had high values of human intestinal absorption (HIA≥80). This study provides the most comprehensive database of Caco‐2 permeability and evidenced the utility of the combined methodology (in silico+in vitro) in the prediction of Caco‐2 permeability. It suggests that the present methodology can be used in the design of large libraries of compounds with appropriate values of permeability and to perform virtual screening in the early stages of drug development.

Authors 7
  1. Hai Pham The (first)
  2. Isabel González‐Álvarez (additional)
  3. Marival Bermejo (additional)
  4. Victor Mangas Sanjuan (additional)
  5. Inmaculada Centelles (additional)
  6. Teresa M. Garrigues (additional)
  7. Miguel Ángel Cabrera‐Pérez (additional)
References 64 Referenced 88
  1. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03318.x
  2. 10.1016/S1359-6446(97)01099-4
  3. 10.2174/156802609789630929
  4. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.003
  5. 10.1002/jps.21068
  6. 10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00128-9
  7. 10.1021/js9803205
  8. 10.1023/A:1022643802296
  9. 10.2174/1568026013394886
  10. 10.1208/s12248-008-9020-0
  11. 10.2165/00126839-200708060-00003
  12. 10.1517/17425255.1.4.613
  13. 10.1021/js950285r
  14. 10.1002/qsar.19960150604
  15. 10.1021/ci010317y
  16. 10.1038/nprot.2007.303
  17. {'journal-title': 'Mol. Pharm.', 'year': '2010', 'author': 'Dahan A.', 'key': 'e_1_2_6_17_2'} / Mol. Pharm. by Dahan A. (2010)
  18. {'key': 'e_1_2_6_18_2', 'first-page': '124', 'volume': '4', 'author': 'Marrero‐Ponce Y.', 'year': '2005', 'journal-title': 'Internet. Electron. J. Mol. Des.'} / Internet. Electron. J. Mol. Des. by Marrero‐Ponce Y. (2005)
  19. STATISTICA(data analysis software system) Version 8 StatSoft Inc. www.statsoft.com 2007.
  20. 10.2174/1389200043335423
  21. 10.1002/9783906390437.ch24
  22. R.Todeschini V.Consonni A.Mauri M.Pavan DRAGON 5.4 ed. Talete srl Milano 2006.
  23. 10.1021/ci00057a005
  24. 10.1021/ja00299a024
  25. J. Frank MOPAC6.0 ed. Seiler Research Laboratory. U.S. Air Force Academy 1993.
  26. 10.1038/bjc.1979.10
  27. 10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2
  28. 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1
  29. 10.1289/ehp.5758
  30. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.08.005
  31. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.05.006
  32. 10.3109/10611869409015895
  33. 10.1023/A:1018935704693
  34. 10.1002/9783527613106
  35. 10.1023/A:1012196216736
  36. 10.1002/jps.1061
  37. 10.1007/BF01200825
  38. 10.1021/ci970002b
  39. 10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00492-1
  40. 10.1021/ci00063a011
  41. 10.1023/A:1027284627085
  42. 10.1021/ci015504a
  43. 10.1021/jm020017n
  44. 10.1021/ci034134i
  45. 10.1021/ci600343x
  46. 10.3109/10611869808997889
  47. 10.1016/S1093-3263(02)00163-8
  48. 10.1023/A:1015040217741
  49. 10.1021/jm901371v
  50. 10.1021/cc9800071
  51. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.03.031
  52. {'key': 'e_1_2_6_54_2', 'first-page': '343', 'volume': '26', 'author': 'Walle U. K.', 'year': '1998', 'journal-title': 'Drug Metab. Dispos.'} / Drug Metab. Dispos. by Walle U. K. (1998)
  53. 10.1177/026119290503300508
  54. 10.1021/mp800122b
  55. 10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00191-1
  56. 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)38734-3 / J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. by Griffiths N. M. (1994)
  57. 10.1290/1071-2690(2002)038<0401:CAAOAV>2.0.CO;2
  58. 10.1016/0006-291X(91)91647-U
  59. M. Rowland T. N. Tozer Clinical Pharmacokinetics: Concepts and Applications 3rd ed. Lea & Febiger Philadephia 1995 p. 601.
  60. {'key': 'e_1_2_6_62_2', 'first-page': '186', 'volume': '7', 'author': 'Marrero‐Ponce Y.', 'year': '2004', 'journal-title': 'J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.'} / J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. by Marrero‐Ponce Y. (2004)
  61. 10.1002/jps.21122
  62. 10.1021/jm049661n
Dates
Type When
Created 14 years, 5 months ago (March 31, 2011, 5:36 a.m.)
Deposited 5 months, 4 weeks ago (March 4, 2025, 2:24 p.m.)
Indexed 5 days, 3 hours ago (Aug. 27, 2025, 12:33 p.m.)
Issued 14 years, 5 months ago (March 31, 2011)
Published 14 years, 5 months ago (March 31, 2011)
Published Online 14 years, 5 months ago (March 31, 2011)
Published Print 14 years, 4 months ago (April 18, 2011)
Funders 0

None

@article{Pham_The_2011, title={In Silico Prediction of Caco‐2 Cell Permeability by a Classification QSAR Approach}, volume={30}, ISSN={1868-1751}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201000118}, DOI={10.1002/minf.201000118}, number={4}, journal={Molecular Informatics}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Pham The, Hai and González‐Álvarez, Isabel and Bermejo, Marival and Mangas Sanjuan, Victor and Centelles, Inmaculada and Garrigues, Teresa M. and Cabrera‐Pérez, Miguel Ángel}, year={2011}, month=mar, pages={376–385} }