Crossref journal-article
Wiley
Angewandte Chemie International Edition (311)
Abstract

AbstractMOF on MOF: Core–shell porous coordination polymer (PCP) crystals are fabricated at the single‐crystal level by epitaxial growth in solution. Synchrotron X‐ray diffraction measurements unveiled the structural relationship between the shell crystal and the core crystal, where in‐plane rotational epitaxial growth compensates the difference in lattice constant.magnified image

Bibliography

Furukawa, S., Hirai, K., Nakagawa, K., Takashima, Y., Matsuda, R., Tsuruoka, T., Kondo, M., Haruki, R., Tanaka, D., Sakamoto, H., Shimomura, S., Sakata, O., & Kitagawa, S. (2009). Heterogeneously Hybridized Porous Coordination Polymer Crystals: Fabrication of Heterometallic Core–Shell Single Crystals with an In‐Plane Rotational Epitaxial Relationship. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 48(10), 1766–1770. Portico.

Authors 13
  1. Shuhei Furukawa (first)
  2. Kenji Hirai (additional)
  3. Keiji Nakagawa (additional)
  4. Yohei Takashima (additional)
  5. Ryotaro Matsuda (additional)
  6. Takaaki Tsuruoka (additional)
  7. Mio Kondo (additional)
  8. Rie Haruki (additional)
  9. Daisuke Tanaka (additional)
  10. Hirotoshi Sakamoto (additional)
  11. Satoru Shimomura (additional)
  12. Osami Sakata (additional)
  13. Susumu Kitagawa (additional)
References 60 Referenced 301
  1. 10.1038/nature01362
  2. 10.1002/anie.200300636
  3. 10.1002/ange.200300610
  4. 10.1002/anie.200300610
  5. 10.1021/ar040163i
  6. 10.1039/B511962F
  7. 10.1002/ange.200703934
  8. 10.1002/anie.200703934
  9. 10.1002/ange.200801163
  10. 10.1002/anie.200801163
  11. 10.1021/ja074366o
  12. 10.1002/ange.200800686
  13. 10.1002/anie.200800686
  14. 10.1021/ja801848j
  15. 10.1039/b806150e
  16. 10.1021/ja7111564
  17. 10.1002/ange.200801631
  18. 10.1002/anie.200801631
  19. 10.1002/ejic.200800002
  20. 10.1039/b718367d
  21. 10.1002/ejic.200800002
  22. 10.1021/ja073506r
  23. 10.1002/ange.200601878
  24. 10.1002/anie.200601878
  25. 10.1021/ja0627444
  26. 10.1021/ja066098k
  27. 10.1021/ja068835i
  28. 10.1021/ja0701208
  29. 10.1038/nmat2101
  30. 10.1021/ja002102v
  31. 10.1021/ja0200241
  32. 10.1039/b400295b
  33. 10.1039/b701088e
  34. 10.1021/jp0130416
  35. 10.1002/ange.200460712
  36. 10.1002/anie.200460712
  37. 10.1021/ic049005d
  38. 10.1002/chem.200401201
  39. 10.1021/ic050452i
  40. 10.1002/ange.200502844
  41. 10.1002/anie.200502844
  42. 10.1039/b707947h
  43. 10.1021/ma7022217
  44. 10.1002/asia.200800112
  45. The yield of the hybridization was estimated as following: one hundred core crystals were used for the reaction in the same manner as described in the Experimental Section. A total of 93 light greenish (hybridized) crystals were counted out of one hundred core crystals. The yield was thus calculated as 93 %.
  46. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)90852-1
  47. 10.1039/dt9860001283
  48. 10.1366/000370273774333966
  49. These unit cell parameters for both1and2are estimated by X‐ray crystal structure analyses for guest‐free porous frameworks. See the Supporting Information for details of the structural analysis for2.
  50. Since frameworks measured herein (1and1/2) most likely contained DMF molecules as guests in the pores giving different unit cell parameters from those of the guest‐free frameworks comparison of the absolute values of each angle in Table S1 in the Supporting Information should be avoided. The difference of the lattice constant between the core crystal and the shell crystal along thea axis is significantly larger than that between the guest‐free framework and the guest‐captured framework as estimated in framework1 for which the crystal structures of both states have been determined.[6d]Therefore we concluded that the effect of guest accommodation on the lattice shrinkage is negligible. See the Supporting Information for details of the comparison of the structural parameters of1and2.
  51. The 2θangles are refined by the peaks in thek o hscans as summarized in Table S1 in the Supporting Information. The same explanation as in footnote [12] is applicable.
  52. The formation of such Miller domains on the well‐defined surface is often observed in two‐dimensional crystals constructed from assembled organic molecules at solid–liquid interfaces see:
  53. 10.1039/B201099M
  54. 10.1039/b206566p
Dates
Type When
Created 16 years, 8 months ago (Dec. 12, 2008, 12:21 p.m.)
Deposited 1 year, 10 months ago (Sept. 28, 2023, 6:07 p.m.)
Indexed 3 weeks, 3 days ago (July 28, 2025, 2:38 a.m.)
Issued 16 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 17, 2009)
Published 16 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 17, 2009)
Published Online 16 years, 6 months ago (Feb. 17, 2009)
Published Print 16 years, 5 months ago (Feb. 23, 2009)
Funders 0

None

@article{Furukawa_2009, title={Heterogeneously Hybridized Porous Coordination Polymer Crystals: Fabrication of Heterometallic Core–Shell Single Crystals with an In‐Plane Rotational Epitaxial Relationship}, volume={48}, ISSN={1521-3773}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200804836}, DOI={10.1002/anie.200804836}, number={10}, journal={Angewandte Chemie International Edition}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Furukawa, Shuhei and Hirai, Kenji and Nakagawa, Keiji and Takashima, Yohei and Matsuda, Ryotaro and Tsuruoka, Takaaki and Kondo, Mio and Haruki, Rie and Tanaka, Daisuke and Sakamoto, Hirotoshi and Shimomura, Satoru and Sakata, Osami and Kitagawa, Susumu}, year={2009}, month=feb, pages={1766–1770} }