AbstractThis review article is an attempt to sketch the important developments in organic synthesis during the past 25 years, and to project them into the future.—The primary motivations that once induced chemists to undertake natural product syntheses no longer exist. Instead of target structures themselves, molecular function and activity now occupy center stage. Thus, inhibitors with an affinity for all the important natural enzymes and receptors have moved to the fore as potential synthetic targets.—New syntheticmethodsare most likely to be encountered in the fields of biological and organometallic chemistry. Enzymes, whole organisms, and cell cultures for enan‐tioselective synthesis of specific substances have already been incorporated into the synthetic arsenals of both research laboratories and industry. In addition, designing appropriate analogues to transition states and intermediates should soon make it possible, with the aid of the mammalian immune system and gene technology, to prepare catalytically active monoclonal antibodies for almost any reaction; perhaps, more important, such processes will increasingly come to be applied on an industrial scale.‐The discovery of truly new reactions is likely to be limited to the realm of transition‐metal organic chemistry, which will almost certainly provide us with additional “miracle reagents” in the years to come. As regards main group elements (“organoelemental chemistry”), we can surely anticipate further stepwise improvements in experimental procedures and the broader application of special techniques, leading to undreamed of efficiency and selectivity with respect to known procedures. The primary center of attention for all synthetic methods will continue to shift toward catalytic and enantioselective variants; indeed, it will not be long before such modifications will be available with every standard reaction for converting achiral educts into chiral products. Analysis, spectroscopy, structure determination, theory, and electronic data processing have all become indispensable in organic synthesis. Only with the aid of these “tools” will the methods of organic chemistry permit selective syntheses of ever larger and more complex systems on both the molecular and supramolecular levels.—Examples have been introduced throughout this discourse to illustrate its many themes, and a very comprehensive bibliography should help the interested reader become more familiar with important keywords and authors.[The list of references is also available upon request in the form of a Microsoft Word© file on diskette.]—This article will have served its intended purpose if it changes the minds of some of those who claim organic chemistry is amature science, and if it causes students to discover the vitality and forcefulness with which organic synthesis is meeting new challenges and attempting to fulfill old dreams.Er zeigt uns so in seinem wissenschaftlichen Leben, daß die Chemie nicht von einer Theorie, nicht von einer Methode aus zu erschöpfen ist, und daß Erkenntnis und Nutzen in ihr untrennbar verwoben sind.“He showed us through his scientific life that chemistry cannot be exploited fully with the aid of asingletheory or asinglemethodology, and that it is a field in which knowledge and application are inextricably linked.” G. Bugge:Das Buch der großen Chemiker, Vol. 2, 4th reprint, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1974.R. Koch, writing about Louis Pasteur

Seebach, D. (1990). Organic Synthesis—Where now? Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 29(11), 1320–1367. Portico.